Skip to main content

Age-related difficulty in post-intubation tracheal stenosis reconstruction: a comparative analysis of CO2-laser, resection and anastomosis, and costal cartilage grafting techniques

Abstract

Background

Costal cartilage graft (CCG) sustains primary donor material for laryngotracheal reconstruction in patients with post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS). But, the elasticity and viability of CCG decrease elderly. This study was aimed to examine the age factor in PITS cases according to the treatment groups, especially in the tracheal reconstruction surgery with CCG group.

Methods

This retrospective study was designed. Patients with a diagnosis of PITS were enrolled. The hazard ratio was calculated with the Cox regression model to define independent risk factors for failure among the variables.

Results

Eighty-five patients diagnosed with post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) were enrolled in the study. Restenosis developed in 19 (22.4%) patients. The failure rate in patients aged 40 years and older was 7.5 times higher on average compared to patients under 40 years of age (p = 0.004, 95% CI: 1.6–35.2). Additionally, age group ≥ 40 and CCG treatment group were a significant risk factors for surgical failure (p = 0.012, HR = 0.0003, 95% CI for HR = 0.0000006–0.173, and p < 0.001, HR = 0.001, 95%CI for HR = 0.000025–0.047, respectively).

Conclusions

Age and CCG group were detected as independent risk factors for surgical failure, possibly due viability of costal cartilage.

Introduction

Post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) or laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) is a challenging issue to manage and often requires a sequential, series of repetitive interventions [1,2,3]. The vast majority of acquired PITS or LTS in adults originated from endotracheal intubation [1,2,3,4]. Treatment options of PITS or LTS include tracheostomies, resection and anastomosis techniques, balloon dilation, laser treatment, T tubes, stents, and reconstruction with autologous cartilage grafts [2, 3, 5,6,7,8,9].

Successful postoperative decannulation was reported 80% and above with laser excision treatment [2, 7]. Success rates with resection and anastomosis techniques have been reported to vary between 40 and 96% [2, 10, 11]. This rate varies according to the length and level of the stenotic segment, the presence of previous interventions, and the characteristics of the patient [2, 11, 12]. The open surgical techniques for augmentation and reconstruction of the airway are another successful method for LTS. Autogenous cartilage graft from the rib, thyroid, auricle, and epiglottis has been used to reshape and keep permanent the airway [3, 9, 13,14,15]. Decannulation success of 90% and above with open surgical resection techniques have been reported in large series in the literature [2, 6, 10]. However, despite these successful results, in almost half of the patients, some additional procedures are required in addition to the primary treatment for a patent airway and decannulation success [1, 2, 16]. Laryngotracheal grafting techniques are relatively preferred in high airway stenosis (close to the glottis), in cases where resection and anastomosis are not suitable, in patients with neck defects, and in the pediatric population [15, 17, 18].

Due to the vitality of the transferred cartilage, airway reconstruction with graft techniques is highly effective in the pediatric population and is the primary recommended treatment method [9, 15, 19]. Therefore, age becomes an important risk factor in laryngotracheal reconstruction with cartilage graft, although it is not found to be significant in other treatment modalities in adults [2, 11]. Furthermore, it was shown that there is a considerable age effect on the elastic material properties of the costal cartilage and that no significant sex effect [20, 21]. Especially over 40 age, a significant calcification was detected compared to the < 40 age group [21]. This study was aimed to examine the age factor in PITS cases according to the treatment groups, especially in the tracheal reconstruction surgery with the costal cartilage graft (CCG) group.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was designed. The study was conducted at a tertiary referential university hospital. Patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) were enrolled in the study between April 2008 and June 2021. Other causes of PITS such as trauma or direct injury or external compression due to neoplastic process, or related prior surgery, were defined exclusion criteria for participants. Also, patients with malignancy, radiation therapy to the neck region, or with a diagnosis of connective tissue disease were eliminated. Patients who underwent urgent tracheostomy or any additional procedures to provide a patent airway during the perioperative period were not included in the study.

Age, gender, treatment for the PITS, the presence of prior interventions for stenosis, Cotton-Myer [22] and McCaffrey [23] grade of the stenosis, rate of the restenosis (decannulation failure) duration to the diagnosis of restenosis, and total follow-up period were identified. Patients were grouped according to treatment as carbon dioxide laser treatment (CO2 laser) or tracheal resection with primary anastomosis (TRPA) and costal cartilage graft (CCG).

Surgical procedure for laryngotracheal reconstruction with costal cartilage graft

General anesthesia, airway approach, neck incision, and anterior laryngeal split were performed as previously described [24]. The anterior cricoid arch was resected bilaterally, and cricothyroid joints were preserved. Stenotic segment of trachea and scar tissue was resected. The trachea was mobilized with a subperichondrial plane dissection. The patient was ventilated through an orotracheal tube inserted in the distal tracheotomy. The posterior cricoid lamina was split in the midline. Costal cartilage was harvested and prepared according to surgical steps defined by Grillo et al. [24]. One of the grafts was placed in the posterior groove and attached to the cricoid with PDS 4-0 sutures. Posterior cartilage graft was covered by anastomosis superior and inferior mucosal flaps. The anterior defect was covered with the other costal cartilage graft fixed to between thyroid cartilage and healthy lower trachea with 4-0 PDS sutures. A T-tube stent was positioned in reconstructed segment and tracheotomy tract. In the follow-up, fiber endoscopic laryngoscopy/bronchoscopy was performed at monthly controls, and T-tubes were removed between 3 and 6 months.

Age, gender, revision status, Cotton-Myer grade, and treatment groups were compared with chi-square test according to surgical results (successful or failure). The hazard ratio was calculated with the Cox regression model to define independent risk factors for failure among the variables.

SPSS 22.0 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The study was carried out in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and subsequent amendments. The institutional review board was approved by the ethic committee of affiliated university for the study (0157-24/03/2022, Izmir Katip Çelebi University).

Results

Eighty-five patients diagnosed with post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) were enrolled in the study. The duration of intubation period was 13.4 ± 4.2 days (range, 1 h–25 days). Forty (% 47.1) of the patients were female, and 45 (%52.9) were male. The mean age of the patients was 41.2 ± 9.6 (min: 19, max: 65). The rate of tracheotomy-dependent patients was 94.1% (n = 80). Nineteen patients (22.4%) had undergone between one and 16 previous surgical interventions including a tracheotomy, dilatation, and T-tube stenting, laser resection, and TRPA. Restenosis developed in 19 (22.4%) patients during a mean follow-up period of 66.2 ± 37.2 months (min: 6, max: 155). Restenosis was diagnosed after a mean of 3.1 ± 2.6 months (min: 1, max: 11, median: 1.8 months) and days in all patients. There were 10 (11.8%) patients in the costal cartilage graft (CCG) group, 21 (24.7%) patients in the CO2 laser group, and 54 (63.5%) patients in the TRPA group. A summary of the findings is given in Table 1. Restenosis rate was 33.3% (n = 7) in the CO2 laser group, 14.8% (n = 8) in the TRPA group, and 40.0% (n = 4) in the CCG group (p = 0.081, χ2 test). Gender distribution and mean age were similar in the treatment groups. The distribution of findings according to treatment groups was given in Table 2.

Table 1 Summary of the findings
Table 2 Distribution of findings according to treatment groups

Gender or Cotton-Myer grade of the PITS or surgery was not found to be risk factors for the development of stenosis (Table 3). The failure rate was found to be significantly higher in revision surgeries (revision vs. primary, p = 0.001, odds ratio: OR =7.0 95% CI: 2.2–22.0). In addition, the age of the patients whose PITS treatment failed was significantly higher than the successful group (p = 0.018, MD: 5.2, 95% CI: 9.5–0.9, t-test). The failure rate in patients aged 40 years and older was 7.5 times higher on average compared to patients under 40 years of age (p = 0.004, 95% CI: 1.6–35.2).

Table 3 Distribution of patients according to surgical results

According to Cox regression analysis age, gender, and the presence of prior surgeries (revision), none of the Cotton-Myer or McCaffrey groups was not an independent risk factors for treatment failure. However, age groups (≥ 40) and CCG treatment group were found to be significant risk factors for surgical failure (p = 0.012, HR = 0.0003, 95% CI for HR = 0.0000006–0.173, and p < 0.001, HR = 0.001, 95% CI for HR = 0.000025–0.047, respectively). In addition, when the treatment groups were analyzed separately, the mean age of patients with surgical failure was found to be significantly higher in both groups (Table 4).

Table 4 T-test statistics of age variable according to treatment groups and results

In the CO2 laser group, 2 of 7 patients who developed restenosis underwent re-laser treatment and 5 of them TRPA surgery. While additional laser treatment was performed in 3 patients in the TRPA group, revision tracheal resection surgery was performed in one patient, and the other four patients underwent tracheal reconstruction with CCG. For the patients with a failed surgery in the CCG group, two patients decided to continue with a tracheostomy cannula, and the other two patients had planned a second grafting with CCG.

Discussion

The mean age of patients with surgical failure was significantly higher in the CCG group; also, age and CCG treatment group were detected as an independent risk factor for decannulation failure. The ossification of the costal cartilage with advancing age is a predictable finding. It can be predicted that cartilage with reduced elasticity and loss of chondrocytes will have a poor prognosis after being transferred to the recipient tissue. The end of the 4th decade has been mentioned before as an age threshold at which costal cartilage ossification occurred and flexibility lost [20, 21, 25]. Although ossification can be detected in previous years, it does not because a problem is clinically related to its transfer to other tissues (cartilage graft). Although it is an expected outcome that the success of the CCG graft will decrease in PITS or LTR surgery at an advanced age (> 50), these patients have not benefited from other priority treatments (e.g., TRPA) or are unsuitable for them (e.g., short neck). Therefore, in addition to recommending other donor sites, such as the use of auricular or nasal septum cartilage in elderly patients, dissection of the central parts of the costal cartilage away from the perichondrium may be considered.

Ossification, which is an important age-related obstacle to obtaining a useful CCG, can begin in the adolescent period and from the 1st costal cartilage. Ultimately, it results in complete fusion of the xiphisternal joint over the age of 35 in men and 40 in women [26]. In addition to age-related changes in costal cartilage ossification, gender-related patterns of calcification show differences. Rejtarova et al. [27] suggested that the peripheral ossification pattern can be considered male specific, while the central lingual ossification pattern determines female sex. Also, they showed that central globular ossifications could be found in both sexes [27].

Gustafson et al. [19] found a 29% reintubation rate after single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction in patients with pediatric congenital and acquired laryngotracheal stenosis. In this study, a significant negative correlation was found between age and reintubation rates in univariate and multivariate analysis. In this study, which included 200 children between the ages of 2 months and 19 years, the success rate was found to be significantly lower in patients aged 4 years and younger [19]. The results of this presented study are completely opposite to the reference study, but the study group and sample size are completely different. In addition, as can be expected, the airway that continues to develop during early childhood is the most important challenging factor, while the viability of CCG transferred at older ages is more important. In similar studies by Younis et al. [17] (n = 46) and Koltai et al. [18] (n = 54) including children who underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction using CCG, the age was not analyzed as a factor for failure. In these studies, success rates were reported as 89% and 83%, respectively.

Terra et al. [15] reported an 80% success rate after tracheal reconstruction performed with CCG in adult Cotton-Myer grade 3 and 4 PITS patients (n = 20). The mean age of patients was reported as 36.1 (min: 18 — max: 54) in this study. In addition, the authors routinely applied solid endolaryngeal stent with T-tube to all patients postoperatively [15]. Liu et al. [9] reported a successful decannulation rate of 74.1 % (n = 46) in a total of 62 patients aged between 2 and 68 years (average 28). They included patients with all causes of LTS even anterior neck defect. A successful decannulation was obtained in the referenced study between 10 days and 12 months postoperatively (average: 6 months) after removing the tracheal T-tube. Risk factors for surgical failure were not discussed in this study [9].

In this presented study, only PITS patients were included, and the sample size was lower than reference studies. According to the literature, the low success rate may be affected by the chosen etiology and sample size. In addition, the size of the stenosis, the patient’s underlying health status (blood sugar, obesity), previous interventions, and the experience of the surgical team may all be effective factors. In this study, the changing structure of the cartilage framework with respect to age was referred to. The small sample size may question the validity of significant results, despite the appropriate statistical method. The TRPA procedure is the gold standard treatment for PITS or LTS in adult and eligible patients [2, 3]. However, if the need for cartilage graft arises, which is inevitable in some cases, it should be taken into account that the age factor may affect the results in rib cartilage harvesting. Of course, this result does not prevent CCG collection, and other cartilage donors are not as abundant as costal cartilage (e.g., ear, septum). However, if needed, nasal septum cartilage with or without mucosa graft, auricular cartilage may be required to harvest in addition to CCG.

The small sample size, with the lack of a homogeneous and adequate number of patients undergoing CCG alone, is an important limitation for evaluating this negative prognostic feature attributed to cartilage grafting. In addition, surgical failure associated with ossified cartilage tissue due to advanced age can only be validated by performing a histopathological examination in this study. This issue is another main limitation of the study. Nevertheless, the detection of cartilage tissue that has lost viability properties during cartilage transfer should encourage surgeons to turn to other cartilage donors.

Conclusion

The viability of costal cartilage deteriorates with age, and the failure rate increases independently. In these cases, other donor sites can be evaluated for harvesting viable cartilage grafts, or different dissection techniques of the costal cartilage can be performed according to different ossification patterns.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical reasons but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fiz I, Monnier P, Koelmel JC, Di Dio D, Fiz F, Missale F, Piazza C, Peretti G, Sittel C (2020) Multicentric study applying the European laryngological society classification of benign laryngotracheal stenosis in adults treated by tracheal or cricotracheal resection and anastomosis. Laryngoscope. 130(7):1640–1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright CD, Li S, Geller AD, Lanuti M, Gaissert HA, Muniappan A, Ott HC, Mathisen DJ (2019) Postintubation tracheal stenosis: management and results 1993 to 2017. Ann Thorac Surg 108:1471–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasan W, Gullane P (2018) Laryngeal split and rib cartilage interpositional grafting: treatment option for glottic and subglottic stenosis in adults. Thorac Surg Clin 28:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donahoe L, Keshavjee S (2018) Contemporary management of idiopathic laryngotracheal stenosis. Thorac Surg Clin 28:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozkul Y, Songu M, Ozturkcan S, Imre A, Erdogan N, Ates D, Ozkul Z (2016) Is T-tube treatment effective in Meyer-Cotton grade 3 tracheal stenosis: long-term outcomes. Acta Otolaryngol 136(9):933–936. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2016.1170877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozkul Y, Songu M, Ozturkcan S, Arslanoglu S, Ates D, Dundar R, Pinar E, Onal K (2015) Tracheal resection with primary anastomosis. J Craniofac Surg 26(6):1933–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozkul Y, Songu M, Imre A, Ates D, Arslanoglu S, Pinar E, Onal K (2015) CO2 laser treatment of tracheal stenosis. Acta Otolaryngol 135(11):1160–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanlikama M, Celenk F, Gonuldas B, Gulsen S (2018) Cervical tracheal resection and anastomosis for postintubation tracheal stenosis. J Craniofac Surg 29(6):e578–e582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhi L, Wenli W, Pengfei G, Pengcheng C, Wenxian C, Jiasheng L, Yongzhu S (2014) Laryngotracheal reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage graft for complex laryngotracheal stenosis and/or anterior neck defect. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(2):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tawfik KO, Houlton JJ, Compton W, Ying J, Khosla SM (2015) Laryngotracheal reconstruction: a ten-year review of risk factors for decannulation failure. Laryngoscope 125:674–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Songu M, Ozkul Y (2020) Risk factors for decannulation failure after single-stage reconstruction of adult post-intubation tracheal stenosis: 10-year experience at a tertiary center. Acta Otolaryngol 140:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ebada HA, El-Fattah AMA, Tawfik A (2021) Revision cricotracheal resection: our experience. J Laryngol Otol 135:57–63

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muntz HR, Lusk RP (1990) A comparison of the cartilaginous rib graft and Evans-Todd laryngotracheoplasties for subglottic stenosis. Laryngoscope 100:415–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lusk RP, Gray S, Muntz HR (1991) Single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 117:171–173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Terra RM, Minamoto H, Carneiro F, Pego-Fernandes PM, Jatene FB (2009) Laryngeal split and rib cartilage interpositional grafting: treatment option for glottic/subglottic stenosis in adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:818–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Özgül MA, Gül Ş, Çetinkaya E, Turan D, Kırkıl G, Uğur Chousein EG, Tanrıverdi E, Özgül G (2019) Our eight years experience in postintubation/posttracheostomy tracheal stenosis. Tuberk Toraks 67(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.68188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Younis RT, Lazar RH, Astor F (2003) Posterior cartilage graft in single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koltai PJ, Ellis B, Chan J, Calabro A (2006) Anterior and posterior cartilage graft dimensions in successful laryngotracheal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:631–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gustafson LM, Hartley BE, Liu JH, Link DT, Chadwell J, Koebbe C, Myer CM 3rd, Cotton RT (2000) Single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction in children: a review of 200 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):430–434. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.109007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber M, Rothschild MA, Niehoff A (2021) Anisotropic and age-dependent elastic material behavior of the human costal cartilage. Sci Rep 11:13618

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hawellek T, Beil FT, Hischke S, Saul D, Hoffmann DB, Kleiss S, Rolvien T, Ries C, Püschel K, Frosch S, Hubert J (2021) Costal cartilage calcification: prevalence, amount, and structural pattern in the general population and its association with age: a cadaveric study. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0063

  22. McCaffrey TV (1992) Classification of laryngotracheal stenosis. Laryngoscope. 102(12 Pt 1):1335–1340

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Myer CM 3rd, O'Connor DM, Cotton RT (1994) Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103(4 Pt 1):319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ, Wain JC (1992) Laryngotracheal resection and reconstruction for subglottic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 53:54–63

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Forman JL, Kent RW (2014) The effect of calcification on the structural mechanics of the costal cartilage. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 17:94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Monum T, Makino Y, Prasitwattanaseree S, Yajima D, Chiba F, Torimitsu S, Hoshioka Y, Yoshida M, Urabe S, Oya Y, Iwase H (2020) Age estimation from ossification of sternum and true ribs using 3D post-mortem CT images in a Japanese population. Leg Med (Tokyo) 43:101663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.101663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rejtarová O, Hejna P, Soukup T, Kuchař M (2009) Age and sexually dimorphic changes in costal cartilages. A preliminary microscopic study. Forensic Sci Int 193:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Data curation, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Formal analysis, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Funding acquisition and investigation, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Methodology, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Project administration, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Resources, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Software, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Supervision, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Validation, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Visualization and roles/writing — original draft, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. Writing — review and editing, YÖ, MS, AFB, and Aİ. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akif İşlek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guidelines on human experimentation (0157-24/03/2022, İzmir Katip Çelebi University) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Consent to participate is not applicable as it is a retrospective study.

Consent for publication

N/A

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozkul, Y., Songu, M., Bayrak, A.F. et al. Age-related difficulty in post-intubation tracheal stenosis reconstruction: a comparative analysis of CO2-laser, resection and anastomosis, and costal cartilage grafting techniques. Egypt J Otolaryngol 38, 100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-022-00294-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-022-00294-y

Keywords

  • Costal cartilage
  • Tracheal stenosis
  • CO2 laser
  • Laryngotracheal reconstruction
  • Decannulation failure