Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Download PDF

Otolaryngologists and iatrogenic facial nerve injury: a meta-analysis

The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 39, Article number: 71 (2023) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 17 May 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Iatrogenic facial nerve injury is one of the otolaryngologists’ major fears during surgeries. Despite technological advances, the risk of iatrogenic facial nerve palsy remains high. The aim of this study is to meta-analyse papers published about different iatrogenic causes of facial nerve injury. This is a meta-analysis study carried out at ENT departments of Cairo and MUST universities in and from April to October 2022. It was structured according to the recommendations of the reporting system for meta-analysis (PRISMA).

Results

A total of 168 manuscripts were revised, and after the comprehensive search, 44 studies met our inclusion criteria; 736 cases out of 15,846 (4.6%) were included. The patients who underwent otolaryngologic surgeries are 716 (97.3%), and those who underwent other related procedures are 20 (2.7%).

Conclusion

Multiple causes of iatrogenic facial nerve injury have been reported. The commonest cause is parotid surgeries (364 cases, 49.5%), and the least common cause is arterial embolization (3 cases, 0.4%). It is more common in females more than males and in adults more than young. The most common injured part is extra-temporal part (199 cases, 27%), and the marginal mandibular branch is the most common injured branch in (160 cases, 21.7%). Geographically, it is more distributed in Germany (175 cases, 23.8%).

Background

Iatrogenic facial nerve injury (IFNI) is one of the most devastating complications of many surgical procedures. Sudden and unexpected facial nerve paralysis (FNP) not only affects the cosmetic issue but also affects patient’s life socially, economically, and psychologically [1].

Iatrogenic facial nerve injury is one of the otolaryngologists’ major fears during surgeries. Despite technological advances, the risk of iatrogenic facial nerve palsy remains high [2].

The aim of this study is to meta-analyse articles published about different iatrogenic causes of facial nerve injury in the field of otolaryngology during different surgical procedures and the incidence of each cause.

Methods

This is a meta-analysis study carried out at ENT departments of Cairo and MUST universities in and from April to October 2022. It was structured according to the recommendations of the reporting system for meta-analysis (PRISMA) as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow chart for the current study

Full size image

This is done by the following steps:

  • 1. Target questions

  • 2. Population, intervention, control, and outcomes (PICO) and PRISMA recommendations

  • 3. Searching strategy

  • 4. Evaluation of articles with study selection

  • 5. Data collection and analysis

  • 6. Interpretation

  • 7. Discussion and conclusion

Target questions

  • a. How can an iatrogenic facial nerve injury occur?

  • b. Which surgery or approach has the highest rate of FN injury?

  • c. Which FN segment is the most affected during IFNI?

Regarding the PICO

  • • The (P) participants: Patients who underwent different surgeries during which the facial nerve was injured

  • • The (I) intervention: Procedures causing iatrogenic facial nerve injury

  • • The (C) comparator: Observation

  • • The (O) outcome: Postoperative rates of IFNI and how to avoid FN injury

Search strategy (identification and location of articles)

We searched on web databases: PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library, Ovid interface, and the search engine Google Scholar from 2000 to 2021, and duplicates were removed.

Keywords used are as follows: facial nerve paralysis, iatrogenic facial nerve injury, iatrogenic facial nerve injury, and delayed facial nerve palsy.

Inclusion criteria are as follows:

  • • Participants of both sexes and all ages are included (human studies).

  • • Iatrogenic facial nerve injury due to different surgeries or procedures

  • • Different types of study design

  • • English articles

Exclusion criteria are as follows:

  • • Idiopathic facial nerve palsy

  • • Congenital facial nerve palsy

  • • Accidental facial nerve injury

  • • Articles in languages rather than English

Evaluation of articles

All articles were 168, and by removing repeated 18 articles (first filter), the total articles were 150. The excluded articles due to irrelevance (the second filter) were 106. So, the included relevant articles are 44 articles as shown in Fig. 1.

  • • PubMed: Results 118, duplicates 14, included 43, and excluded 61

  • • Ovid: Results 35, duplicates 4, included 1, excluded 30

  • • Cochrane Library: Results 15 — all are excluded.

Data collection and analysis

Reported in results

Interpretation

Reported in results

Discussion and conclusion

Reported in discussion and conclusion

Results

A total of 168 manuscripts were revised, and after the comprehensive search, 44 studies met our inclusion criteria; 736 cases out of 15,846 (4.6 %) were included for meta-analysis. The patients who underwent otolaryngological surgeries are 716 (97.3%), and those who underwent other related procedures are 20 (2.7%).

Demographic data

Facial nerve injury is more predominant in females; in this study, it occurred in 378 females (51.4%), while it occurred only in 321 males (43.6%). Two out of 44 studies did not mention the sex discrimination including 37 cases (5%). The mean age of the cases of each study was also included in table with a total mean age about 41.9 ± 2.5 standard deviation (SD). Three out of the 44 papers did not mention the age of the included cases as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic data of the study’s articles
Full size table

Incidence and aetiology of iatrogenic facial nerve injury

The size of total sample included is 15,846 cases and underwent different surgical procedures. In comparison with other causes of facial nerve injury, IFNI has a low incidence rate (736 patients, 4.6%). P-value among studies is statistically significant (P < 0.0001), 95% CI = 99.34 to 99.55%) as in Fig. 2 and Table 2. The number of cases with FN injury differs in relation to the type of surgery; the highest number of cases is those who underwent parotid surgeries (364 cases, 49.5%), while arterial embolization as in glomus tumour and facial arteriovenous fistula by microparticles of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) has the least number of cases (3 cases, 0.4%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Incidence of FNP in different surgeries

Full size image
Table 2 Incidence and aetiology of facial nerve palsy
Full size table

During parotidectomy, there were 364 cases (49.5%) with FN injury including 104 cases with primary surgeries and 10 cases with revision surgery. There were 120 patients with total parotidectomy including two patients who underwent radical parotidectomy in which the facial nerve was sacrificed. There were also 97 cases of superficial (lateral) parotidectomy.

Surgical resection of tumours comes in the second place by 173 cases (23.5%); 95 cases (12.9%) in vestibular schwannoma resection by the trans-labyrinthine approach and 78 cases (10.6%) during resection of skull base tumours and FN schwannoma caused FNP in 78 cases (10.6%).

Otologic surgeries account for 168 cases (22.8%). Most common is mastoidectomy in 49 cases (6.7%) and then tympanoplasty in 32 cases (4.3%) and myringoplasty in 13 cases (1.8%). The 49 mastoidectomy cases include 7 cases with revision surgery and 41 cases with primary surgeries. Primary surgeries include 12 cases with modified radical (MRM), 5 with radical mastoidectomy (RM), and 8 cases with cortical mastoidectomy (CM). Cochlear implantation (CI) accounts 54 cases (7.3 %) through posterior tympanotomy approach. Also, there were 20 cases of stapedectomies including 14 cases of primary stapedectomy and 6 cases of revision surgeries.

Anaesthesia procedures account for 16 cases (2.2%) of FNP including 5 cases during inferior alveolar nerve block for different dental procedures and 11 cases after anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy surgery caused by infiltration with bupivacaine substance in the peritonsillar space.

Onset of facial nerve palsy

Eighteen out of the 44 studies reported the onset of facial paralysis. Immediate onset occurred in 282 cases (38.3%), while delayed onset FNP occurred in 454 cases (61.7%). P-value among studies is statistically significant (P < 0.0001), 95% CI = 96.41 to 98.12% as shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Onset of facial nerve paralysis
Full size table

Clinical picture of facial palsy

In the present study, 379 cases (51.5%) have incomplete FNP, while complete FNP occurred in 350 cases (47.7%). Seven cases are missed in the studies. P-value among studies is statistically significant (P < 0.0001), 95% CI = 94.19 to 97.23% as shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Clinical picture of facial nerve palsy
Full size table

Site of facial nerve injury

The extra-temporal part is the most common site injury; it was injured in 199 cases (27%), while the intratemporal part was injured in 114 cases (15.5%). The intracranial part is the least injured by 33 cases (4.5%). The marginal mandibular nerve is the most common injured branch in 160 cases (21.7%) and then the chorda tympani branch in 37 cases.

The facial nerve was intact in 58 cases (7.9%), while it was injured partially in 30 cases. It was dehiscent in 24 cases, swollen in 23 cases, and transected in 20 cases. The FN was sacrificed in 17 cases (2.3%) mostly during parotid surgeries.

Diagnosis of facial nerve injury

House-Brackmann grading system is the most common diagnostic tool used in these studies. It was used in almost all studies, but facial palsy grades are mentioned clearly in 248 cases (33.7%) as the following: 31 cases with grade 1, 88 cases with grade 2, 59 cases with grade 3, 48 cases with grade 4, 17 cases with grade 5, and only 5 cases with grade 6. Electrophysiological tests were used in all parotid surgery and cochlear implantation studies. Radiological investigations as HRCT and MRI were used pre- and postoperative in most of the studies. Also, panoramic radiography was used in dental procedures, while neck radiography is used post tonsillectomy.

Management of facial nerve injury

Facial nerve exploration and decompression were done in about 19 cases (2.6%), while cable nerve graft was used in 15 cases (2%) including greater auricular nerve graft in 14 cases and sural nerve in one case, while muscle transfer is used in 5 cases. Facial nerve anastomosis was used in 5 patients including end-to-end anastomosis and facio-facial anastomosis.

Prognosis and duration of facial nerve palsy

After many treatment approaches used in these studies, about 357 cases (48.5%) had complete recovery, 161 cases (21.9%) had incomplete or partial recovery, while 28 cases (3.8%) did not recover. About 190 patients had no records of recovery.

The period of paralysis of facial nerve was heterogeneous across reports ranging from 8 h in Shlizerman and Ashkenazi (2005) [27] to 36 months in Rinaldo et al. (2002) [12]. The mean period of paralysis was 203 days. Only 3 studies did not mention the recovery duration.

Geographical distribution of the FNP cases in the world

In this meta-analysis study, 44 papers are included from 17 countries all over the world. The largest number of studies done in one country was 10 papers in the United States of America (USA). However, the largest number of cases was 175 in Germany (23.8%) as shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Geographical distribution of the FNP cases in the world
Full size table

Discussion

Injury to the facial nerve is an undesirable drawback in the field of otolaryngology; this could happen even with expert surgeons. For an inexperienced surgeon, the fear of injury in the nerve may lead to the avoidance of the FN instead of identifying it [46].

This may be the first meta-analysis that includes different types of surgeries resulting in IFNI that may face otolaryngologists. Other meta-analysis studies only discussed one or two types of surgeries, but we included 10 different types of surgeries from 17 different countries in the world. Also, we included a high number of studies (44 papers) about the double or triple of some other meta-analysis studies.

In this study, in a series of 736 patients of iatrogenic facial palsy out of total 15,846 cases, parotid surgeries were implicated to be the most common cause of facial nerve injury (49.5%), and then, surgical resection of tumours by 173 cases (23.5%) and otologic surgeries accounts for 168 cases (22.8%). Alberti and Biagioni (1972) have agreed that IFNI is the most common and severe complication of parotid gland surgery [47]. Hohman et al. (2014) agreed that resections of the head and neck are the second most common cause of IFNI followed by ear surgeries, but they stated that maxillofacial surgeries are the most common cause of IFNI [48]. This can be justified that they did not include any patients who underwent parotid surgeries and included large number of cases who underwent oral surgeries in the opposite.

Oliver et al. (1980) agreed that the extra-temporal part is the most common injured portion. In our study, it was injured in 199 cases (27%), followed by the intratemporal part in 114 cases (15.5%) [49]. Olsen et al. (1994) agreed that the marginal mandibular branch is the most common injured branch; in this study, it was involved in 160 cases (21.7%) and then chorda tympani branch in 37 cases (5%) [50]. Michael and Raut (2007) have agreed that chorda tympani nerve injury has a higher incidence rate in otologic surgeries [10].

The results presented in this study suggest a high incidence rate of FN injury after primary otologic surgeries (159 cases, 33%) more than that after revision surgeries (23 cases, 4.8%). On the other hand, Schuring (1988) and Wiet (1982) have a statistically significant difference in their results. They stated that the incidence of IFNI associated with primary surgeries has been estimated to be 0.6% while 3.7% in revision surgeries [51, 52]; this can be justified by high number of primary otologic surgeries done by junior staff and residents who did not identify well the FN landmarks during primary surgery. Also, in the studies we entailed, most of the revision surgeries were performed by expert senior staff, and the urgent referral to multidisciplinary management centres reduces the incidence of IFNI in revision surgeries. Also, the increased use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IOFNM) during surgeries and the revolution in radiological field help to identify well the facial nerve course and to detect the lesions, thus helping in avoiding the facial nerve injuries nowadays.

In the present study, 379 cases (51.5%) have incomplete or transient facial nerve palsy more than complete palsy; Perekrest and ZhM (1983) and Gerlings (1932) agreed with that [53, 54]. Eisele et al. (2010), Prasad et al. (1993), and Hughes et al. (1995) agreed that complete FNP is mostly caused by sacrificing the FN during parotid carcinoma or surgical resection of vestibular Schwannoma and skull base tumours. In our study, FN was sacrificed in 17 cases of parotid surgeries [55,56,57].

This study reported that IOFNM was used in all cases of CI and helped in reducing the IFNI rate. But it was also used in most of parotidectomies, and it is the most common cause of IFNI. We suggest this is related to surgeons’ surgical skills.

Kumar et al. (2000) agreed that the CT scan could identify the site of injury of the intratympanic part of the FN, and this will be helpful in managing the case. In all our patients, preoperative CT in primary otologic surgery for chronic ear is less beneficial in avoiding FN injury. However, for revision ear surgery, HRCT is more helpful to the surgeon in identifying the extent of the disease, the anatomy of the facial nerve [58]. Surgeons with complete immediate postoperative FN paralysis reported that the anatomical landmarks of facial nerve could not be identified intraoperatively [2].

In this study, we noticed that early revision surgery should be attempted within a few days. Facial nerve exploration and decompression were done in about 19 cases (2.6%), while cable nerve graft was used in 15 cases (2%) including greater auricular nerve graft in 14 cases and sural nerve in one case. About 359 cases (48.6%) had complete recovery. Gittins et al. (1999) agreed that immediate repair of the cut FN is carried out by cable grafting after identifying the proximal and distal ends of the cut nerve [59].

This study noticed some deficiencies that should be considered as follows:

  • (1) Other languages rather than English were excluded.

  • (2) Some individual patient data were missed.

  • (3) Most of the studies included were retrospective case series or case reports.

  • (4) Small sample size

  • (5) This meta-analysis includes studies over the years from 2000 to 2021.

Conclusion

The risk of iatrogenic facial nerve injury during neurotological surgeries is exceedingly low compared with other causes of facial nerve injury (735/15,846 cases, 4.6%). The commonest cause of IFNI is parotid surgeries (364 cases, 49.5%), and the least common cause is embolization (3 cases, 0.4%). It is more common in females more than males and in adults more than young. Facial nerve injury is of delayed onset in (454 cases, 61.7%) more than immediate onset. The most common injured part is extra-temporal part (199 cases, 27%), and the marginal mandibular nerve is the most common injured branch in (160 cases, 21.7%). Geographically, it is more distributed in Germany (175 cases, 23.8%), that is regarding articles were included in this study. The prognosis of facial nerve palsy seems to be excellent regardless the treatment strategy; 48.5% of cases have complete recovery. Using anatomical landmarks and intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, also surgeons’ good surgical skills decrease the incidence of nerve injury. The facial nerve should remain the otolaryngologist’s friend.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. Bradbury ET, Simons W, Sanders R (2006) Psychological and social factors in reconstructive surgery for hemi-facial palsy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(3):272–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asma A, Marina MB, Mazita A, Fadzilah I, Mazlina S, Saim L (2009) Iatrogenic facial nerve palsy: lessons to learn. Singapore Med J 50(12):1154–1157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Linder T, Mulazimoglu S, El Hadi T, Darrouzet V, Ayache D, Somers T, Schmerber S, Vincent C, Mondain M, Lescanne E, Bonnard D (2017) Iatrogenic facial nerve injuries during chronic otitis media surgery: a multicenter retrospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 42(3):521–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Safdar A, Gendy S, Hilal A, Walshe P, Burns H (2006) Delayed facial nerve palsy following tympano-mastoid surgery: incidence, etiology and prognosis. J Laryngol Otol 120(9):745–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Long YT, Athar PP, Mahmud R, Saim L (2004) Management of iatrogenic facial nerve palsy and labyrinthine fistula in mastoid surgery. Asian J Surg 27(3):176–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar R, Karthikeyan CV, Singh CA, Preetam C, Sikka K (2011) Iatrogenic facial nerve palsy “Prevention is better than cure”: analysis of four cases. Indian J Otol 17(4):170–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu P, Liu W, Zuo W, Wang D, Wang H (2015) Delayed facial palsy after tympanomastoid surgery: a report of 15 cases. Am J Otolaryngol 36(6):805–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caylan R, Bektas D, Dikmen T, Bektas O, Omay SB, Ovali E (2006) Mesenchymal stem cells in iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis: a possible role in the future. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(10):963–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou Y, Song R, Li Y (2015) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of delayed facial palsy after tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 135(2):201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Michael P, Raut V (2007) Chorda tympani injury: operative findings and postoperative symptoms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(6):978–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shea JJ, Ge X (2001) Delayed facial palsy after stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 22(4):465–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rinaldo A, Mondin V, Ferlito A (2002) Immediate facial nerve palsy following stapedectomy. ORL 64(5):355–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marioni G, de Filippis C, Gaio E, Staffieri A (2002) Delayed facial nerve palsy following uneventful stapedectomy. ORL 64(1):45–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salvinelli F, Casale M, Vitaliana L, Greco F, Dianzani C, D’Ascanio L (2004) Delayed peripheral facial palsy in the stapes surgery: can it be prevented? Am J Otolaryngol 25(2):105–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thom JJ, Carlson ML, Olson MD, Neff BA, Beatty CW, Facer GW, Driscoll CL (2013) The prevalence and clinical course of facial nerve paresis following cochlear implant surgery. Laryngoscope 123(4):1000–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheahan P, Viani L (2007) Delayed facial palsy in a patient with a bifid facial nerve lending support for viral theory of facial palsy. Otol Neurotol 28(3):414–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mandour MF, Khalifa MA, Khalifa HM, Amer MA (2019) Iatrogenic facial nerve exposure in cochlear implant surgery: incidence and clinical significance in the absence of intra-operative nerve monitoring. Cochlear Implants Int 20(5):250–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alzhrani F, Lenarz T, Teschner M (2016) Facial palsy following cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(12):4199–4207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fayad JN, Wanna GB, Micheletto JN, Parisier SC (2003) Facial nerve paralysis following cochlear implant surgery. Laryngoscope 113(8):1344–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Joseph ST, Vishwakarma R, Ramani MK, Aurora R (2009) Cochlear implant and delayed facial palsy. Cochlear Implants Int J 10(4):229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Binnetoglu A, Demir B, Batman C (2020) Surgical complications of cochlear implantation: a 25-year retrospective analysis of cases in a tertiary academic center. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277(7):1917–1923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meier JD, Wenig BL, Manders EC, Nenonene EK (2006) Continuous intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in predicting post-operative injury during parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 116(9):1569–1572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Regan B, Bharadwaj G, Bhopal S, Cook V (2007) Facial nerve morbidity after retrograde nerve dissection in parotid surgery for benign disease: a 10-year prospective observational study of 136 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(2):101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guntinas-Lichius O, Gabriel B, Klussmann PJ (2006) Risk of facial palsy and severe Frey’s syndrome after conservative parotidectomy for benign disease: analysis of 610 operations. Acta Otolaryngol 126(10):1104–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaillard C, Périé S, Susini B, St Guily JL (2005) Facial nerve dysfunction after parotidectomy: the role of local factors. Laryngoscope 115(2):287–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Upton DC, McNamar JP, Connor NP, Harari PM, Hartig GK (2007) Parotidectomy: ten-year review of 237 cases at a single institution. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(5):788–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shlizerman L, Ashkenazi D (2005) Peripheral facial nerve paralysis after peritonsillar infiltration of bupivacaine: a case report. Am J Otolaryngol 26(6):406–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Windfuhr JP, Schlöndorff G, Sesterhenn AM, Kremer B (2009) From the expert’s office: localized neural lesions following tonsillectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(10):1621–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rinaldi V, Casale M, Bressi F, Potena M, Vesperini E, De Franco A, Silvestri S, Zini C, Salvinelli F (2012) Facial nerve outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery: our experience. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 73(1):21–27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pu JK, Wong SC, So KH, Tsang AC, Li LF (2020) Acupuncture as part of iatrogenic facial nerve palsy rehabilitation first report. World Neurosurg 140:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Misirlioglu M, Adisen MZ, Okkesim A, Akyil YY (2016) Facial nerve paralysis after dental procedure. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 4(3):80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tzermpos FH, Cocos A, Kleftogiannis M, Zarakas M, Iatrou I (2012) Transient delayed facial nerve palsy after inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia. Anesth Prog J 59(1):22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hotta M, Endo S, Tomita H (2002) Taste disturbance in two patients after dental anesthesia by inferior alveolar nerve block. Acta Otolaryngol 122(4):94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chevalier V, Arbab-Chirani R, Tea SH, Roux M (2010) Facial palsy after inferior alveolar nerve block: case report and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(11):1139–1142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rai KK, Shivakumar HR, Sonar MD (2008) Transient facial nerve palsy following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for setback of the mandible: a review of incidence and management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(2):373–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Alberio N, Maugeri R, Alessandrello R, Cinquemani G, Lipani R, Gambadoro C, Nobile F, Ruggeri L, Spitaleri A, Iacopino DG, Francaviglia N (2018) Peripheral facial palsy following ventriculoperitoneal shunt. the lesson we have learned. Interdiscip Neurosurg J 13:20–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ramdasi RV, Rangarajan V, Mahore A (2015) Lower motor neuron facial palsy after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. BMJ Case Reports journal, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-206938.

  38. Pang D, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Smith M, Zovickian J (2005) Progressive cranial nerve palsy following shunt placement in an isolated fourth ventricle: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatrics 102(3):326–331

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vrabec JT, Coker NJ, Jenkins HA (2003) Delayed-onset facial paralysis after vestibular neurectomy. Laryngoscope 113(7):1128–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Feng AY, Jin MC, Wong S, Pepper JP, Jackler R, Vaisbuch Y (2021) Facial nerve paralysis following endovascular embolization: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 130(7):848–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee DH, Lee JK, Yoon TM, Lim SC, Kim TS (2015) Facial palsy after neck arteriovenous fistula embolization. Laryngoscope 125(9):2125–2128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Odat H, Alawneh K, Al-Qudah M (2018) Facial nerve paralysis after Onyx embolization of a jugular paraganglioma: a case report with a long-term follow up. J Clin Med 7(3):48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanna M, Bacciu A, Falcioni M, Taibah A (2006) Surgical management of jugular foramen schwannomas with hearing and facial nerve function preservation: a series of 23 cases and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 116(12):2191–2204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Limb CJ, Niparko JK, Tunkel DE (2001) Trans-tympanic stimulation of the facial nerve to assess nerve integrity in iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(5):600–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hayler R, Clark J, Croxson G, Coulson S, Hussain G, Ngo Q, Ch’ng S, Low TH (2020) Sydney facial nerve clinic: experience of a multidisciplinary team. ANZ J Surg 90(5):856–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sheehy JL (1974) The facial nerve in surgery of chronic otitis media. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 7(2):493–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Alberti PW, Biagioni E (1972) Facial paralysis in children. a review of 150 cases. Laryngoscope 82(6):1013–1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hohman MH, Bhama PK, Hadlock TA (2014) Epidemiology of iatrogenic facial nerve injury: a decade of experience. Laryngoscope 124(1):260–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Oliver P (1980) Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis. Surg Clin North Am 60(3):629–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Olsen KD (1994) Tumors and surgery of the para-pharyngeal space. Laryngoscope 104(5):1–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schuring AG (1988) Iatrogenic facial nerve injury. Otol Neurotol J 9(5):432–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wiet RJ (1982) Iatrogenic facial paralysis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 15(4):773–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Perekrest AI, ZhM R (1983) Neuritis of the facial nerve as a complication of local anesthesia and tonsillectomy. Vestnik Oto-Rino-Laringologii 3:77–78

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gerlings PG (1932) Facial paralysis by local anesthesia in tonsillectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 17(4):420–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Eisele DW, Wang SJ, Orloff LA (2010) Electrophysiologic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy. Head & neck: J Sci Spec Head Neck 32(3):399–405

    Google Scholar 

  56. Prasad S, Myers EN, Kamerer DB, Demetris AJ (1993) Neurilemmoma (schwannoma) of the facial nerve presenting as a parotid mass. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108(1):76–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hughes KV III, Olsen KD, McCaffrey TV (1995) Para-pharyngeal space neoplasms. Head Neck J 17(2):124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kumar A, Mafee MF, Mason T (2000) Value of imaging in disorders of the facial nerve. Top Magn Reson Imaging 11(1):38–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gittins J, Martin K, Sheldrick J, Reddy A, Thean L (1999) Electrical stimulation as a therapeutic option to improve eyelid function in chronic facial nerve disorders. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40(3):547–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ENT Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Sameh M. Zamzam & Mohamed Salah Hassouna

  2. ENT Department, Faculty of Medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt

    Mohamed Khairy Elsawy & Shereen Hamdy Gafaar

Authors
  1. Sameh M. Zamzam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Salah Hassouna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed Khairy Elsawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shereen Hamdy Gafaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SMZ contributes with the idea, data, general supervision, writing the paper, and submit the paper. MSH contributes with data collection and general revision. MKE contributes with methods, data collection and analysis, and writing. SHJ contributes with data collection and revision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sameh M. Zamzam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of ENT Department, Cairo, and MUST Universities. Reference number: not applicable/or not available. Consent to participate is not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: the name of the department has been updated.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zamzam, S.M., Hassouna, M.S., Elsawy, M.K. et al. Otolaryngologists and iatrogenic facial nerve injury: a meta-analysis. Egypt J Otolaryngol 39, 71 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-023-00440-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-023-00440-0

Keywords

  • Facial nerve palsy
  • Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis
  • Iatrogenic facial nerve injury
  • Delayed facial nerve palsy