Congenital dacryocystocele is more common than acquired dacryocystocele. Acquired dacryocystocele in adults is a rare occurrence and is usually secondary. Common conditions that can result in secondary dacryocystocele include chronic rhinosinusitis, trauma, tumors, radiation, granulomatous diseases, surgery, and acute invasive fungal sinusitis [3, 4]. All these conditions must be ruled out before labelling it as idiopathic [2]. The present case did not have any history or features suggestive of any such causes, and hence, it is most likely idiopathic. The pathophysiology of idiopathic acquired dacryocystocele is considered to be a long standing obstruction of nasolacrimal duct and functional blockade at the junction where common canaliculus opens into lacrimal sac resulting in dacryocystocele formation [1, 2].
Imaging is mandatory to aid in diagnosis. Both CT and magnetic resonance imaging are useful for studying the bony anatomy as well as the characteristics of the lesion. Imaging reveals a homogenous fluid-filled cyst that shows enhancement at its rim. Dacryocystoceles do not have any solid component within them [5, 6]. A forgotten foreign body that results in granuloma in the nasal cavity and lacrimal system can cause similar symptoms. Lacrimal syringing and probing help identify the site of obstruction. A hard stop while probing is due to NLD and a soft stop is due to canalicular obstruction. A soft stop is felt when the mucosal fold is encountered during examination and can be mistaken as canalicular obstruction [7]. Regurgitation of the turbid fluid during irrigation indicates NLDO and clear fluid indicates canalicular obstruction.
Dacryocystocele presents with recurrent epiphora, medial canthal swelling, and recurrent episodes of dacryocystitis [5]. A presentation without a history of dacryocystitis in acquired dacryocystocele is extremely rare, and only a few cases have been reported. Unlike its congenital counterpart, patients usually do not respond to conservative treatment. Surgical intervention is the treatment of choice [1, 2, 7,8,9]. Surgical drainage can be achieved via external or endoscopic approaches [10]. Success rates are similar, but with the advent of endoscopic DCR, most surgeons prefer endoscopic management, as it has major advantages over the external approach. Surgery is scarless and bleeding is less. Endoscopic DCR can be performed safely as a daycare procedure and does not injure or affect the action of the orbicularis oculi muscle, which helps in the pumping of tears [11].
Adequate opening of NLD, appropriate bone removal, prevention of postop synechiae and adhesions, proper postoperative follow-up, addressing anatomical factors such as concha bullosa, high DNS, large agger nasi, and proper placement of mucosal flaps are important to prevent recurrence. A large ethmoidal mucocele may sometimes mimic a dacryocystocele. Stenting may not be necessary in all cases. If a lacrimal stent is used, it is usually removed after 4–14 weeks [12]. The application of mitomycin C application is used in some cases [9]. Stenting was not done in our case.
On follow-up, the patient had no complaints.