Bilateral xanthogranulomatous inflammation of nasal and nasopharynx mass: a case report

Abstract

Background

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation is an uncommon condition in adult nasal cavity and nasopharynx.

Case presentation

We report a male patient who developed xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the bilateral nose and nasopharynx. The patient was not responsive to oral steroid. Multiple biopsies were taken to confirm the definitive diagnosis, and endoscopic debulking of mass was performed to provide symptomatic relief. Patient was free from nasal symptoms, and residual nasal and nasopharyngeal masses showed no increment in size and number during follow-up.

Conclusion

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx can be easily confused with other nasal masses. A histopathology examination is crucial to establish the diagnosis. A repeated biopsy is needed if previous biopsy result is inconclusive. Surgical excision is recommended for symptomatic relief. The effectiveness of medical treatment is still unclear. A long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Background

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation is a rare chronic inflammatory condition that is characterized by aggregation of the lipid-laden foamy macrophages or xanthoma cells. This disease entity is well recognised in the kidney and gallbladder [1, 2]. It is seldom detected in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx. Due to its rarity and non-specific presentation, xanthogranulomatous inflammation can be confused with other benign/malignant tumour preliminary. Thus, we report a case of xanthogranulomatous inflammation in bilateral nasal cavity and nasopharynx in a 50-year-old gentleman and highlight its diagnostic challenges.

Case presentation

A 50-year-old male health care worker with underlying hypertension and diabetes mellitus type II presented with epistaxis, nasal block and hyposmia for the past 4 months. Endoscopic examination showed firm irregular lobulated yellowish-reddish masses arising from the right anterior 1/3 of the septal nasal mucosa and left lateral wall. Bilateral torus tubarius appeared as a hypertrophy with irregular yellowish lesion on each medial surface (Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1

Endoscopic view of nasopharynx showed the right torus tubarius is more prominent than the left side with irregular yellowish lobulated lesion on the medial surface

Cutaneous examination revealed mobile, firm, papulonodular lesion at different sites of his body (Fig. 2). The first histopathological result of the nasal and nasopharynx biopsies reviewed granulomatous inflammation. Relevant laboratory investigations showed negative results for tuberculosis, Wegener granulomatosis and lymphoma. Radiographic examination was performed to characterize the composition and extension of the mass (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2

View of papulonodular lesion at forearm (*)

Fig. 3

Axial contrast-enhanced CT images showing enhancing masses at bilateral anterior nasal cavities (red arrows) and nasopharynx (yellow arrows)

Repeated nasal biopsies revealed xanthogranulomatous inflammation. Oral prednisolone was prescribed to the patient empirically with 50 mg OD with tapering dose for a total of 1 month and continued with maintenance dose of 20 mg OD for another 1 month; however, the nasal symptoms were not improved, and the masses were not reduced in size. Endoscopic transnasal excision and debulking of bilateral nasal masses was performed subsequently. Intraoperatively, the operative sites were noted to ooze actively which causes difficulty in excising the masses completely. At post-operative 6 months, despite the presence of residual nasal mass, the patient is asymptomatic without any recurrent epistaxis and nasal blockage (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Endoscopic examination post operatively showed a remnant of xanthogranuloma at the right nasal septum and left lateral nasal wall

Discussion

Xanthogranulomatous (XG) processes are rare inflammatory conditions with the characteristic pathologic feature of lipid-laden macrophages or histiocyte cells. Infection and inflammation, histiocytic processes or inherited lysosomal disorders could be the causes of xanthogranulomatous process. Pyelonephritis and cholecystitis are commonly seen in infectious or inflammatory type processes of XG. Histiocytosis is grouped into Langerhans and non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Summarise classification of XG processes is showed in Fig. 5. Pathophysiologically, a great number of neutrophil, lymphocyte, plasma cells, fibroblasts, foreign body giant cells and histiocyte are seen in the acute phase of the infectious/inflammatory XG process, which result in capillary proliferation, collagen formation and haemorrhage. Xanthoma cell is formed when the histiocytes engulf the erythrocytes. The consequence of the whole inflammatory process is the formation of granulation and necrosis debris. Eventually, the organ tissue is replaced by xanthoma cells, formation of granulomas, and proliferation of fibrin and collagen deposition, giving rise to tissue destruction [1].

Fig. 5

Summarise classification of XG processes

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx can mimic other nasal masses which makes it represent a challenging diagnostic problem. The differential diagnosis range from benign to highly malignant conditions which compose of inflammatory (rhinosinusitis with polyp, Samter’s triad), infection (syphilis, nasal vestibulitis, tuberculosis), systemic disease (Wegener’s granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, midline lethal granuloma, rhinoscleroma) and neoplasm (inverted papilloma, hemangioma, squamous cell carcinoma, lymphoma). In view of the appearance of the mass and the age of patient, our initial differential diagnoses were more focused on neoplasm, infectious and systemic causes. However, a series of laboratory test (rheumatoid factor test, antinuclear antibody test, rapid plasma reagin test, biopsy for acid fast bacillus and tuberculosis culture) and computed tomography of paranasal sinus showed inconclusive diagnosis until a repeated biopsy of the mass was conducted. Other reported visceral organ cases showed the similar diagnostic dilemma. In their cases, xanthogranulomatous inflammation could only be diagnosed by histopathological examination. The clinical and radiographic finding is non-specific and provides little value in the diagnosis of the disease [3,4,5,6].

The initial histopathological examination of the nasal cavity mass and nasopharynx revealed the presence of granulomatous inflammation. A granulomatous inflammation can be masked by the presence of infection, inflammatory reaction or neoplasm (e.g. lymphoma). With reference to our case, tuberculosis infection, Wegener granulomatosis and lymphoma were ruled out. In view of the uncertainty of the diagnosis, repeated biopsies were taken to arrive at a more conclusive, definitive diagnosis.

Documentation regarding its medical treatment is limited. Over the past decade, only a successful case of pharmacological therapy was reported in English literature review where a combination of intralesional and oral steroid was used in urethral xanthogranulomatosis which showed full remission [7]. However, in our case, empirical oral prednisolone over the course of 2 months did not show any response. Intralesional steroid was not an option as the mass was prone to bleeding upon manipulation.

In view of fail conservative and medical therapy, surgical excision was offered. In our patient, complete excision of the mass was hindered due to the excessive bleeding encountered intraoperatively. Thus, debulking surgery was performed. Difficulties in surgical dissection have been reported in xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, where longer duration of cholecystectomy is needed if compared with other disorders, basically due to the adhesion and concomitant pathology [3].

Our case showed good surgical outcome that is comparable with the case reports mentioned earlier [2, 4,5,6,7]. Table 1 showed the comparison of different locations of xanthogranulomatous inflammation and intervention outcome. At post-operative 6 months, despite the presence of residual nasal mass, the patient is asymptomatic without any recurrent epistaxis and nasal blockage. Having said that, our follow-up is short and longer follow-up is needed.

Table 1 Comparison of different location of xanthogranulomatous inflammation and intervention outcome (1, 3, 4, 5, 6)

Conclusion

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx can be easily confused with other nasal masses. A histopathology examination is crucial to establish the diagnosis. A repeated biopsy is needed if previous biopsy result is inconclusive. Surgical excision is recommended for symptomatic relief. The effectiveness of medical treatment is still unclear. A long-term follow-up is mandatory.