Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine Hcl versus intravenous pre-incisional lornoxicam in reducing post-tonsillectomy pain: this is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Abstract

Background

Tonsillectomy is one of the most common procedures in otorhinolaryngology practice where analgesics are required for pain-relief especially in children. To compare the efficacy of using peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine Hcl versus intravenous preincisional lornoxicam in reducing post tonsillectomy pain.

Results

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Ninety-nine patients from age 12 to 18 years old, prepared for tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly subdivided into three groups as 33 patient in each group to receive either lidocaine (group 1), lornoxicam (group 2), or saline as a placebo (group 3). Anesthesia was induced using intravenous fentanyl and propofol, while endotracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium and maintenance by halothan. Intraoperative bleeding, pain scores, interval until first order for analgesic. The postoperative complications including bleeding, hypoxia, nausea, and vomiting also were observed. Pain scores at rest were significantly lower in group 2 than groups 1 and 3 at all observation times. Similarly, pain scores were lower in group 2 during the first 5 postoperative hours. The mean time for rescue analgesic was 276 min in group 2, 91 min in group 1, and about 60 min in group 3. No significant differences were noted for intraoperative bleeding.

Conclusion

The use of lornoxicam 16 mg at preoperative phase gave good control of immediate post tonsillectomy pain.

Level of evidence

3b

Background

One of the most common procedures in otorhinolaryngology practice is tonsillectomy. However, the recovery time from the surgery is a painful feeling. The pain increases during swallowing leading to poor nutrition and delay in returning to normal activities especially in children. That is why the provision of good analgesia leads to less physiologic derangement and may decrease morbidity. So, in children, analgesics are very important for postoperative pain relief. The drugs that are usually prescribed include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, and opioids [1].

The use of NSAIDs may lead to increased postoperative bleeding [2]. Although the analgesic mechanism of action (i.e., inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis) is the same as all available NSAIDs, the analgesic effects relative to side effects may vary from a drug to a drug [3].

Lornoxicam is a nonselective NSAID, with analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic effects [4]. Lornoxicam has a short half-life of 3 to 5 h [5]. At preincisional phase intravenous administration of lornoxicam decrease postoperative pain after different types of surgery, and it reduces the need for postoperative rescue pain medication [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Lidocaine Hcl has been used as a local anesthetic. It has a rapid onset and intermediate duration. That helps easy recovery and control of pain in the immediate postoperative time [12].

This study targets to compare the efficacy of using peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine Hcl versus intravenous preincisional lornoxicam in reducing post tonsillectomy pain.

Methods

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was signed from all patients’ parents or first degree relatives.

This study includes 99 patients aged from 8 to 18 years. They were arranged for elective tonsillectomy due to chronic tonsillitis. Patients were excluded from the study if they had a history of significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and hematologic disease or hypersensitivity to any of the drugs used in the study were excluded. The patients were randomly allocated to three equal groups of 33 patients.

Group 1 received 20 ml intravenous saline and 4 ml lidocaine Hcl peritonsillar infiltration at pre-incisional phase. Group 2 received 8 mg intravenous lornoxicam on 20 ml saline and 4ml saline peritonsillar infiltration at pre-incisional phase and group 3 received 20 ml intravenous saline and 4ml saline peritonsillar infiltration at pre-incisional phase. Peritonsillar infiltration was done in both sides in a fan like manner from the upper to the lower pole using a spinal needle.

Bipolar tonsillectomy technique was used in all patients. The blood loss during the operation, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, the first time of asking rescue analgesic, the amount of rescue analgesic used during the first 12 and 24 postoperative hours, the first time of drinking and eating, nausea, vomiting, and needing anti-vomiting drug during the first 24 h were recorded.

Intraoperative blood loss was assessed by visual estimation of the blood volume in swabs and suction bottle. After surgery, postoperative pain was evaluated at rest and during swallowing using observation criteria score (Table 1), verbal rating scale (VRS) with (no pain=0, mild pain = 1, moderate pain = 2, severe pain =3), patient’s or parents’ satisfaction, and first time asking rescue analgesic (acetaminophen). The first examination was done immediately after the patient was transferred to the ward, which was 15 min postoperatively. Observation was then made at 30 min and 1, 4, 16, and 24 h after surgery.

Table 1 Observation criteria

Statistical analysis

Data collected were handled by using SPSS version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Qualitative data expressed as numbers and percentages while quantitative data expressed as means ± SD. The Student t test was used to compare the significance of difference for quantitative variables that follow normal distribution.

Results

The study groups were almost similar in age and sex distribution (Table 2). The observed criteria of the patients in group 2 (lornoxicam) showed that those patients had the lowest painful criteria in all times of recording among all groups, followed by group 1 (lidocaine) and the maximum pain. Group 2 (Lornoxicam group) showed lower observation criteria score compared to group 1 (lidocaine HCL group) and group 3 (control group) (Table 3, Fig. 1).

Table 2 Age and sex distribution among studied patients in three groups
Table 3 Observation criteria score in different time points (mean ± SD)
Fig 1
figure 1

Group 2 (lornoxicam group). Group 2 (lornoxicam group) showed lower observation criteria score compared to group I (lidocaine HCL group) and group 3 (control group)

This result was supported by the verbal rating scale )VRS) which rated the postoperative pain is the least using the preoperative lornoxicam (Fig. 2). Both measures showed statistically significant values.

Fig 2
figure 2

Verbal rating scale in different time points among studied patients in three groups. Verbal rating scale in group 2 is significantly lower than the other groups in comparing to others

The times asking rescue analgesic were the longest in group 2 (276.7 ± 35.3 min) followed by group 1 (91.9 ± 34.6 min) then group 3 (59.2 ± 33.2 min) (Fig. 3).

Fig 3
figure 3

Time to first rescue analgesia. Group 2 (Lornoxicam group) showed longer time to first rescue analgesia rating scale compared to group 1 (lidocaine HCL group) and group 3 (control group)

Group 2 (lornoxicam group) showed longer time to first rescue analgesia rating scale compared to group 1 (lidocaine HCL group) and group 3 (control group).

There were no significant differences between the study groups regarding the operation time (Table 4) or amount of blood loss (Fig. 4).

Table 4 Intraoperative time among studied patients in three groups
Fig 4
figure 4

Intraoperative blood loss. Intra-operative blood loss was not significantly different between three groups

Intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different between the three groups.

Discussion

One of the most important targets for patients who underwent tonsillectomy is to provide safe and effective analgesia and good pain management. Some methods of pain control can cause post-tonsillectomy complications [13].

Lornoxicam is NSAID with highly potent short-acting analgesic properties [4]. It exerts its analgesic effect by inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) I and II, leading to a release of endogenous dynorphin and beta-endorphin [14, 15]. It has a good tolerability profile and longer duration of effect than other NSAIDs [10, 16], a central effect that seems to be independent of anti-inflammatory effects.

Lornoxicam has no effect on body temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, and spirometry.

Due to these properties and its availability as a parenteral form, lornoxicam may be favorable for acute perioperative pain management, particularly in patients for whom perioperative oral administration is undesirable [17].

Eight and 16 mg were the selected dose of IV lornoxicam used in clinical trials [6,7,8,9,10,11, 16, 18,19,20]. In this study, we used was 8 mg because the study group was young. The least dose gave effective pain control in most of the patients. Lornoxicam 16 mg may produce more potent analgesia and of longer duration [16, 19, 20], but better reserved for older patients.

In this study, preoperative lornoxicam 8 mg gave effective immediate postoperative analgesia. This is a good effect of lornoxicam on postoperative pain relief which was clinically evident by decreased pain scores, a longer time to another analgesic request with a reduction in the first 24-h analgesic consumption. This significant reduction in analgesic consumption was achieved by pre-incisional lornoxicam.

Lidocaine is a local analgesic, usually applied by submucosal infiltration in combination with epinephrine to achieve local vasoconstriction and get a double effect, to obtain homeostasis and get a longer reduction of postoperative pain in most surgeries [21].

In 2003, Irfan said that no matter the injection was lidocaine or normal saline, the difference in postoperative pain was not statistically significant [12].

In this study, there was about 30-min difference between the lidocaine and the saline group in asking for rescue analgesia, with the upper hand for the lidocaine.

Conclusion

At preoperative, lornoxicam 8 mg gave potent pain relief in the immediate period following tonsillectomy since preoperative lornoxicam prevented the need for postoperative analgesia especially during the first postoperative 4 h and decrease the total dose of rescue medication needed during the first postoperative 24 h. There was no incidence of bleeding during the perioperative observation period, and no need of excessive sedation or respiratory depression was noted among the study patients.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

ml:

Milliliter

NSAIAD:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

VRS:

Verbal rating scale

COX:

Cyclooxygenase

References

  1. Carla G, Sno W, Kayser F (2002) Does dexamethasone with preemptive analgesia improve pediatric tonsillectomy pain? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Salonen A, Kokki H, Nuutinen J (2002) Recovery after tonsillectomy in adults: a three-week follow-up study. Laryngoscope 112(1):94–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200201000-00017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Souter AJ, Fredman B, White PF (1994) Controversies in the perioperative use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Anesth Analg 79(6):1178–1190. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199412000-00025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hitzenberger G, Radhofer-Welte F, Takacs F (1990) Pharma- cokinetics of lornoxicam in man. Postgrad Med J 66(Suppl 4):S22–S27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenow DE, Albrechtsen M, Stolke D (1998) A comparison of patient- controlled analgesia with lornoxicam versus morphine in patients undergoing lumbar disk surgery. Anesth Analg 86(5):1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199805000-00026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karaman Y, Kebapci E, Gurkan A (2008) The preemptive analgesic effect of lornoxicam in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled study. Int J Surg 6(3):193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sener M, Yilmazer C, Yilmaz I, Bozdogan N, Ozer C, Donmez A, Arslan G (2008) Efficacy of lornoxicam for acute postoperative pain relief after septoplasty: a comparison with diclofenac, ketoprofen, and dipyrone. J Clin Anesth 20(2):103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.09.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inanoglu K, Gorur S, Akkurt CO, Guven OE, Kararmaz A (2007) The analgesic efficacy of preoperative versus postoperative lornoxicam in varicocele repair. J Clin Anesth 19(8):587–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.06.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sapolya O, Karamanhoglu B, Memis D (2007) Analgesic effects of lornoxicam after total abdominal hysterectomy. J Opioid Manag 3(3):155–159. https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2007.0053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sener M, Yilmazer C, Yilmaz I, Caliskan E, Donmez A, Arslan G (2008) Patient-controlled analgesia with lornoxicam vs. dipyrone for acute postoperative pain relief after septorhinoplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Anaesthe- siol 25(3):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021507002827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Işik B, Arslan M, Özsoylar Ö, Akçabay M (2009) Preoperative lornoxicam versus tramadol on postoperative pain and adverse effect in adult tonsillectomy patients. Agri 21(3):113–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmut O, Zeliha K, Levent S (2012) Comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine in the management of post-tonsillectomy pain. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:1831–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yogita P, Priyanka (2016) Randomized prospective study of comparison of intravenous lornoxicam and intravenous fentanyl for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in minor to moderate Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgeries. Res Innov Anesthesia 1(1):10–14. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones RFM (1987) Anatomy of the mouth, pharynx and oesophagous. In: Ballantyne J, Groves J (eds) Scott Brown’s Diseases of Ear, Nose and Throat, vol 1, 5th edn. Butter worth and co-publishers, London, pp 295–347

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kullich W, Klein G (1992) Influence of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug lornoxicam i.v. on the secretion of the endogenous opiate peptides dynorphin and β-endorphin. Aktuel Rheumatol 17(04):128–132. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1047362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kocaayan E, Ozkardeşler S, Ozzeybek D, Bayindir S, Akan M (2007) Comparison of effects of preoperatively administered lornoxicam and tenoxicam on morphine consumption after lap aroscopic cholecystec- tomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 24(8):714–719. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021507000300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Balfour JA, Fitton A, Barradell LB (1996) Lornoxicam. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of painful and inflammatory conditions. Drugs 51(4):639–657. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199651040-00008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Staunstrup H, Ovesen J, Larsen UT, Elbaek K, Larsen U, Krøner K (1999) Efficacy and tolerability of lornoxicam versus tramadol in postoper- ative pain. J Clin Pharmacol 39(8):834–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/00912709922008362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nørholt SE, Sindet-Pedersen S, Bugge C, Branebjerg PE, Ersbøll BK, Bastian HLA (1995) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose- response study of the analgesic effect of lornoxicam after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. J Clin Pharmacol 35(6):606–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb05018.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takmaz SA, Inan N, Goktug A, Erdogan I, Sunay M, Ceyhan A (2008) The analgesic effect of 8 and 16 mg lornoxicam administered before shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Urology 72(2):282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peyman B, Mohammad MZ, Masoumeh S, Omid R, Seyed RH, Fatemeh AM (2013) Post tonsillectomy pain: can honey reduce the analgesic requirements. Anesth Pain 3(1):198–202. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.9246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

This is study adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

The Universal Trial Number (UTN) is U1111-1264-5053.

Trial registration number (TRN) ILROTN73825691

Retrospectively registered

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RZ analyzed and interpreted the patients’ data regarding otorhinology examination and scoring system. EH was responsible for collecting the data, follow-up of patients, and analysis of the results. II was responsible for collecting the data, the follow-up of patients, and printing the results. MB was responsible for the analysis of the statistical section and performed the discussion, and all authors contributed in writing the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reham Farouk Zittoon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Local ethics committee (Faculty of Medicine Suez Canal University under the number 333 date of approval - September 2017).

Informed written consent to participate in the study was provided by all participants and their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16. And all participants included in the study have been informed about the procedures to be done and the expected results.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for the publication was obtained from the participants and from their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zittoon, R.F., Hassan, E.Y., Ibrahem, I.H. et al. Peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine Hcl versus intravenous pre-incisional lornoxicam in reducing post-tonsillectomy pain: this is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Egypt J Otolaryngol 37, 103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00161-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00161-2

Keywords