- Original Article
- Open Access
Assessing the applications of cortical auditory evoked potentials as a biomarker in children with cochlear implants
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 29, pages 263–268 (2013)
Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are noninvasive measures used to quantify central auditory system function in humans. More specifically, the P1–N1–P2 cortical auditory evoked potential has a unique role in identifying the central auditory system that has benefited from amplification or implantation. P1 reflects the maturation of the auditory system in general as it has developed over time.
The aims of this study were to assess the CAEP in children with cochlear implants compared with age-matched controls, to study the different variables affecting the results, and to compare the pattern of P1 CAEP in cochlear implant patients compared with that in those with hearing aids.
Thirty-five hearing-impaired children (using cochlear implants) were compared with 20 age-matched and sex-matched children with normal hearing. In both groups, P1 CAEP latency and waveform morphology were recorded using free-field auditory stimulation with tone bursts at 500 and 2000 Hz at 100 dB sound pressure level in two sessions that were 6 months apart.
Children using cochlear implants exhibited prolongation of P1 latencies, indicating an overall delay in maturation when compared with that in children who could hear normally. P1 CAEP latency and amplitude improved significantly after 6 months of device use.
Standardized age-appropriate normative data on P1 CAEPs in the pediatric Egyptian population could be used to determine implantation or amplification results.
Nash A, Sharma A, Dorman M. Clinical applications of the P1 central auditory evoked potential (CAEP) biomarker. A sound foundation through early amplification. Proceedings of a Fourth International Conference, 2007 in Chicago. Chicago, IL; 2007.
Burdo S, Razza S, Di Berardino F, Tognola G. Auditory cortical responses in patients with cochlear implants. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2006;26:69–77.
Billings C, Tremblay K, Souza P, Binns M. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2007;12:234–246.
Sharma A, Martin K, Roland P, Bauer P, Sweeney MH, Gilley P, Dorman M. P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:564–573.
Purdy S, Gardner-Berry K. Auditory evoked potentials and cochlear implants: research findings and clinical applications in children. Perspectives on Hear & Hear Disorders in Childhood 2009;19:14–21.
Ching TYC, Chaogang W, Cao K, Zhang V, Dillon H, Lu Y, et al. Use of aided cortical responses and everyday functional performance for pediatric cochlear implant candidacy. Proceedings of the 7th Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences–APSCI, 2010 in China. Monduzzi Editore International, Medimond; 2010.
Golding M, Dillon H, Seymour J, Carter L. The application of cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) recordings in infant hearing aid fitting. In: Proceedings of the 53rd EUHA International Congress of Hearing Aid Acousticians, 15–17 October 2008. Leipzig; 2008.
Purdy S, Kelly A, Thorne P. Auditory evoked potentials as measures of plasticity in humans. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:211–215.
Sharma A, Dorman M. Central auditory development in children with cochlear implants: clinical implications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006;64:66–88.
Tremblay K. Beyond the ear: physiological perspectives on auditory rehabilitation. Semin Hear 2005;26:127–136.
Ponton C, Eggermont J, Khosla D, Kwong B, Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:407–420.
Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T, Nicol T. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;104:540–545.
Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N. Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear Hear 2000;21:554–568.
Sharma A, Dorman M, Spahr A. A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hear 2002;23:532–539.
Ponton C, Don M, Eggermont J, Waring M, Masuda A. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1996;17:430–437.
Sharma A, Dorman M, Spahr A. Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport 2002;13:1365–1368.
Galina D, Moskauer G, Stadt K. Late auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners during the first days of hearing rehabilitation. Unpublished MD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander University; 2010.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Mostafa, I.Z., Shabana, M.I., El Shennawy, A.M. et al. Assessing the applications of cortical auditory evoked potentials as a biomarker in children with cochlear implants. Egypt J Otolaryngol 29, 263–268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000434108.90389.fc
- cochlear implant
- cortical auditory evoked potentials
- free field