Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Download PDF

Correlation between the Arabic pediatric voice handicap index and both the auditory perceptual assessment and acoustic analysis of voice in patients with hyperfunctional childhood dysphonia

The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 29, pages 124–129 (2013)Cite this article

En

Abstract

Background

Pediatric voice disorders have typically been blamed on vocal abuse. Changes in the pitch, loudness, and overall vocal quality tend to interfere with communicative abilities. Recently, research has focused on pediatric voice disorders and the effects of a voice disorder on a child’s life. It has been reported that children felt that their voice disorders resulted in negative attention and limited their participation in activities.

Aim

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the pediatric voice handicap index (p-VHI) and both the auditory perceptual assessment (APA) and acoustic analysis of voice in patients with hyperfunctional childhood dysphonia.

Participants and methods

This study included 32 children diagnosed with hyperfunctional childhood dysphonia within the age range of 4.7–11.8 years, with a mean of age of 8.4 years; 22 (68.75%) were boys and 10 (31.25%) were girls. All patients were subjected to an APA of their voice after a modified GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) scale, and the domains were graded on a scale of 0–3, in which 0 is normal and 3 is severe. Acoustic voice analysis was carried out using Kay Elemetrics’ Computerized Speech Laboratory to obtain the following perturbation measures: jitter (%), shimmer (%), and harmonic to noise ratio. All patients were examined by videolaryngoscopy using fiberoptic nasofibrolaryngoscopes. Parents of all patients were given an Arabic p-VHI form that consists of 23 items divided among three subscales: functional, physical, and emotional. Scoring of the Arabic p-VHI is on the basis of an ordinal scale: the parents rate each statement between ‘0’ and ‘4’, in which ‘0’ represents a response of ‘never’, ‘1’ represents ‘almost never’, ‘2’ represents ‘sometimes’, ‘3’ represents ‘almost always’, and ‘4’ represents ‘always’. From these responses, a total score was obtained by adding the values of all responses ranging from 0 to 92.

Results

The mean scores on the different domains of the Arabic p-VHI among the study groups were 18.6±3.75 in the functional domain (range 4–31), 20.91±8.36 in the physical domain (range 6–34), 13.11±4.86 in the emotional domain (range 3–28), and 52.77±18.15 (range 13–80) in the total score. Correlation between the domains of the APA and those of the Arabic p-VHI showed a significant correlation between both the functional and physical domains of the Arabic p-VHI, namely roughness, breathiness, and strain quality, and pitch, and overall severity, whereas the emotional domain was not correlated with any of the APA domains. The p-VHI total score showed a significant correlation with the overall severity of dysphonia and breathiness. Correlation between the Arabic p-VHI domains and perturbation measures showed a significant correlation between all the domains and all acoustic perturbation measures, namely jitter (r=0.83; P=0.42), shimmer (r=0.81; P=0.39), and harmonic to noise ratio (r=0.76; P=0.36).

Conclusion and recommendations

The Arabic p-VHI seems to be a useful tool in children with dysphonia. Although it could help in assessment of the degree of disability that a voice disorder is causing, it should not be used as a sole clinical tool. Other clinical evaluation procedures such as APA and acoustic analysis of voice are strongly recommended in the evaluation of voice disorders and defining the amount of voice handicap.

References

  1. Connor NP, Cohen SB, Theis SM, Thibeault SL, Heatley DG, Bless DM. Attitudes of children with dysphonia. J Voice. 2008; 22: 197–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park SungShin, Kwonb Tack-Kyun, Choi C SeongHee, Won Yong Lee, Young Hye Hong, Nyun Gi Jeong, et al. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of Pediatric Voice Handicap Index: in school age children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:107–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobson BH, Jhonson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson GMS. Benninger the voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997; 6: 66–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nawka T, Wiesmann U, Gonnermann U. Validation of the German version of the voice handicap index (VHI). HNO. 2003; 51: 921–930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nunez-Batalla F, Corte-Santos P, Senaris-Gonzalez B, Liorente-Pendas JL, Gorriz-Gil C, Suarez-Nieto C. Adaptation and validation to the Spanish of the voice handicap index (VHI-30) and its shortened version (VHI-10). Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2007; 58: 386–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Kuik M, Bodt DJ, Guimaraes I, Holmberg EB, Nawka T. Validation of the voice handicap index by assessing equivalence of European translations. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60:173–178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zur KB, Cotton S, Kelchner L, Baker S, Weinrich B, Lee L. Pediatric voice handicap index (pVHI): a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 1: 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malki KH, Mesallam TA, Farahat M, Bukhari M, Murry T. Validation and cultural modification of Arabic voice handicap index. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 11: 1743–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farahat M. Validity and reliability of Arabic voice handicap index-10. Saudi J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 14: 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klassen AF, Landgraf JM, Lee SK, Barer M, Rania P, Chan HW. Health related quality of life in 3 and 4 year old children and their parents: preliminary findings about a new questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003; 1: 81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shoeib RM, Malki KH, Mesallam TA, Farahat M, Shehata YA. Development and validation of the Arabic pediatric voice handicap index. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 76: 1297–1303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotby MN. The Smith accent method of voice therapy. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing Group Inc.; 1995. pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kotby MN. Voice disorders: recent diagnostic advances, new dimensions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 11: 337–340.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson K, Brehm SB, Weinrich B, Meinzen-Derr J, de Alarcon A. Comparison of the Pediatric Voice Handicap Index with perceptual voice analysis in pediatric patients with vocal fold lesions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 137: 1258–1262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schindler A, Gilardone M, Spadola Bisetti M, Di Rosa R, Ottaviani F, Schindler O. Physical examination in dysphonia syndrome. Acta Phon Lat. 2000; 22: 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peeters AJ, Van Gogh CD, Goor KM, Verdonck-De Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, Mahieu HF. Health status and voice outcome after treatment for T1a glottic carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;261:534–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Campisi P. Computer-assisted voice analysis: Establishing a pediatric database. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 128: 156–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Millet BD. What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998; 50: 305–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bless DM, Hirano M, Feder RJ. Videostroboscopic evaluation of the larynx. Ear Nose Throat J. 1987; 66: 289–296.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Floris L, Wuyts M, Geert M, Marc R, Jan R. The dysphonia severity index. An objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000; 43: 796–809.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical assessments of speech and voice. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Singular; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kent RC, Read C. Acoustic analysis of speech. 2nd ed. Albany, NY: Singular; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Phoniatrics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Hassan H. Ghandour MD & Fatma-Alzahraa A. Kaddah

Authors
  1. Hassan H. Ghandour MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatma-Alzahraa A. Kaddah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan H. Ghandour MD.

Additional information

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghandour, H.H., Kaddah, FA.A. Correlation between the Arabic pediatric voice handicap index and both the auditory perceptual assessment and acoustic analysis of voice in patients with hyperfunctional childhood dysphonia. Egypt J Otolaryngol 29, 124–129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000427456.52975.43

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000427456.52975.43

Keywords