- Original article
- Open access
- Published:
Clinical evaluation of central auditory processing functions in the elderly
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 28, pages 208–213 (2012)
En
Abstract
Background
Central auditory processing dysfunction is a general term that is applied to individuals whose hearing in quiet settings is normal or almost normal, and yet who have substantial hearing difficulty in the presence of auditory stressors such as competing noise and other difficult hearing situations. It is noticed that the prevalence of central auditory processing dysfunction increases with age.
Objectives
Evaluation of the effects of aging on central auditory processing in elderly individuals who report good hearing sensitivity.
Methodology
Thirty elderly individuals ranging in age from 60 to 75 years, right-handed, and who reported good hearing sensitivity participated in this study. The results of the synthetic sentence identification with an ipsilateral competitive message (SSI–ICM) and staggered spondee words (SSW) tests were compared with those of 15 young adults ranging in age from 20 to 40 years with normal hearing sensitivity as a control group.
Results
The findings of the study showed a statistically significant difference between the control group and the elderly group in terms of SSI, with a lower percentage in the elderly group. The results of the SSW test showed that there was a significant difference in scoring between competing and noncompeting conditions, with more affection in the competing condition in both the control and the elderly groups. When we compared the control group and the elderly group in terms of the SSW error score in the competing condition in both ears, it was found that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, with more error scores in the elderly group.
Conclusion
Central auditory processing is affected by aging as shown by the lower percentage of results of the SSI–ICM test and more errors in the SSW test mainly in the competing conditions relative to the control group.
References
Cooper JC Jr., Gates GA. Central auditory processing disorders in the elderly: the effects of pure tone average and maximum word recognition. Ear Hear. 1992;13:278–280
Golding M, Taylor A, Cupples L, Mitchell P. Odds of demonstrating auditory processing abnormality in the average older adult: the blue mountains hearing study. Ear Hear. 2006; 27: 129–138
Bellis TJ. Auditory processing disorders: it’s not just kids who have them. Hear J. 2003; 56: 10–19
American Academy of Audiology. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder. American Academy of Audiology; 2010.
Pichora-Fuller MK. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(Suppl 2):2S26–2S32
Cruz OLM, Kasse CA, Sanchez M, Barbosa F, Barros FA. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors in auditory processing disorders in elderly patients: preliminary results. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9 I):1656–1659
Phillips DP, Farmer ME. Acquired word deafness, and the temporal grain of sound representation in the primary auditory cortex. Behav Brain Res. 1990; 40: 85–94
Kraus N, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Nicol TG, Koch DB. Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science. 1996; 273: 971–973
Bellis TJ, Nicol T, Kraus N. Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry in the neural representation of speech sounds. J Neurosci. 2000; 20: 791–797
Jerger J, Moncrieff D, Greenwald R, Wambacq I, Seipel A. Effect of age on interaural asymmetry of event-related potentials in a dichotic listening task. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000; 11: 383–389
Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N. Correlation between brainstem and cortical auditory processes in normal and language-impaired children. Brain. 2005; 128: 417–423
Song J, Banai K, Russo N, Kraus N. On the relationship between speech- and non-speech evoked brainstem responses in children. Audiol Neurotol. 2006; 11: 233–241
Musiek FE, Gollegly KM, Kibbe KS, Verkest SB. Current concepts on the use of ABR and auditory psychophysical tests in the evaluation of brain stem lesions. Am J Otol. 1988;9(Suppl):25–35
Jerger J, Jerger S. Clinical validity of central auditory tests. Scand Audiol. 1975; 4: 147–163 Quoted from Jerger et al. (2000)
Musiek FE, Wilson DH. SSW and dichotic digit results pre- and post-commissurotomy: a case report. J Speech Hear Disord. 1979; 44: 528–533 Quoted from Music et al. (1998)
Katz J. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory nervous system. J Auditory Res. 1962; 2: 327–337 Quoted from Katz (1990)
Katz J. Tentative criteria for individuals 60 through 79 years. SSW Rep. 1990; 12: 1–6
Keith RW. Interpretation of the Staggered spondee word (SSW) test. Ear Hear. 1983; 4: 287–292
Katz J. Central test battery. Vancouver, WA: Precision Acoustics; 1998.
Hellige J. Hemispheric asymmetry: what’s right and what’s left. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1993.
Skinner MW. Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980; 67: 306–317
Maura L, Flavio B, Flavia B, Mauricio M, Heloisa H. Auditory processing assessment in older people with no report of hearing disability. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2008; 74: 896–902
Katz J, Ivey R. Spondaic procedures in central testing. Handbook of clinical audiology. In: Katz J, editor. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. pp. 239–255.
Medwetsky L. Central auditory processing testing: a battery approach. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of clinical audiology. 26 Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2002. pp. 510–524.
Martin JS, Jerger JF. Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(Suppl 2):25–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hamada, S.M., El Sebie Besher, A., Omara, A.A.M. et al. Clinical evaluation of central auditory processing functions in the elderly. Egypt J Otolaryngol 28, 208–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000418019.70401.06
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000418019.70401.06