Skip to main content

Studying some elicited verbal prosodic patterns in Egyptian children

En

Abstract

Background

Despite the large number of native Arabic speakers, Arabic prosodic skills have not been studied thoroughly.

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the perceptual judgment and acoustic characteristics of some elicited verbal prosodic patterns in a group of typically developing Egyptian children aged 2 years 2 months through 5 years 11 months in order to aid in the early identification of prosodic impairment in this age group.

Participants and methods

The sample included 40 healthy typically developing Egyptian children aged 2 years 2 months through 5 years 11 months old. Participants were divided into two groups: group I included 20 children aged 2 years 2 months to 3 years 11 months old. Group II included 20 children aged 4 years 2 months to 5 years 11 months old.

The prosodic patterns studied included socioaffective as well as grammatical patterns. The prosody of each elicited response was perceptually studied and acoustically analyzed. The results obtained were analyzed statistically using comparative and correlation studies.

Results

(a) Significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to the perceptual scores of all the prosodic patterns studied, except resentment and interrogative patterns. (b) Significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to acoustic values. (c) For all the studied parameters, no significant differences were found between males and females. (d) The highest mean perceptual score obtained by the studied group was that obtained for the interrogative pattern, whereas the lowest ones obtained were for exception and warning patterns. (e) A significant positive correlation was found between age and the Total Perceptual Prosodic Scores (TPPS). (f) A significant negative correlation was found between duration and most of the perceptual scores. (g) A significant positive correlation was found between frequency and most of the perceptual scores. (h) A significant positive correlation was found between energy and most of the perceptual scores.

Conclusion

(a) The production of different Arabic prosodic patterns is associated with changes in frequency, duration, and energy. (b) The easiest prosodic patterns to be imitated by children are the interrogative and resentment patterns, whereas the most difficult ones were the exception, disapproval, and warning patterns. (c) Elicited prosodic patterns do not differ with sex in children.

References

  1. Hellermann J. The sequential and prosodic co-construction of a ‘quiz game’ activity in classroom talk. J Pragmatic. 2005; 37: 919–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shriberg LD, Kent RD. Clinical phonetics. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jusczyk PW, Cutler A, Redanz NJ. Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Dev. 1993; 64: 675–687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerken LA, McGregor K. An overview of prosody and its role in normal and disordered child language. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1998; 7: 38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouston F. Prosody: the music of language and speech. The ASHA leader 2003; 5:7-9. Available at: http://www.asha.org/leader/2003

  6. McCann J, Peppé S, Gibbon FE, O’Hare A, Rutherford M. Prosody and its relationship to language in school-aged children with high-functioning autism. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007; 42: 682–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Merewether FC, Alpert M. The components and neuroanatomic bases of prosody. J Commun Disord. 1990; 23: 325–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shriberg LD, Paul R, McSweeny JL, Klin AM, Cohen DJ, Volkmar FR. Speech and prosody characteristics of adolescents and adults with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001; 44: 1097–1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Snow D. Prosodic markers of syntactic boundaries in the speech of 4-year-old children with normal and disordered language development. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41: 1158–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baum SR. The role of fundamental frequency and duration in the perception of linguistic stress by individuals with brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41: 31–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. American Speech Language Hearing Association. Childhood apraxia of speech [technical report]. ASHA Practice Policy. 2007. Available at: www.asha.org/policy [Accessed on 2007]

  12. Cutler A. Lexical stress. The handbook of speech perception. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005. pp. 264–389.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolinger D. Around the edges of intonation. Harv Educ Rev. 2004; 34: 282–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kochanski G, Grabe E, Coleman J, Rosner B. Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 118: 1038–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. El Kamash S. Lexicon and semantics. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Faculty of Arts and Humanities, King Abdel Aziz University; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Greenberg S, Carvey H, Hitchcock L, Chang S. Temporal properties of spontaneous speech–a syllable-centric perspective. J Phonetics. 2003; 31: 465–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adam G. From variable to optimal grammar: evidence from language acquisition and language change. Tel Aviv: Tel-Aviv University; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCann J, Peppé S, Gibbon F, O’Hare A, Rutherford M. The prosody-language relationship in children with high functioning autism. Autism: an integrated view from neurocognitive, clinical and intervention research. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2006. pp. 214–235.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grossman RB, Bemis RH, Plesa Skwerer D, Tager Flusberg H. Lexical and affective prosody in children with high-functioning autism. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010; 53: 778–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clark J, Yallop C, Fletcher J. An introduction to phonetics and phonology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. El Aini SH. Vowels in Arabic language: arabic phonology. Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Cultural Literature Club; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schultz MC. Word influences in speech discrimination. J Speech Hear Res. 1964; 64: 395–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mostafa E. Arab mosque lessons. Beirut, Lebanon: Modern Library; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anees I. Speech sounds. Cairo, Egypt: American Inglo Library; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weinberg WA, Harper CR, Brumback RA. Attention, behavior and learning problems in children: protocols for diagnosis and treatment. 1st ed. BC Decker: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PMPH USA; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kadzasov SV, Krivnova OF. Obschaja fonetiks. [Obschaja Phonetics]. Moscow: Russian University for the Humanities Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Robert D, van Valin JR. The aquisition of WH-Questions and the mechanisms of language acquisition. In Tomasello M, editor. The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Psychology Press; 1998. pp. 221–249

  28. Tong Z, Mark H, Stephen EL Mental state detection of dialogue system users via spoken language. USA: University of Illinois at Urban Champaign; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lacheret A, Victorri B. The period intonation units of analysis for consideration of the French speaking: prosodic and linguistic issues. Verbum. 2002; 24: 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  30. Murray IR, Arnott JL. Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 93: 1097–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishi CT, Campbell N Analysis of acoustic prosodic features of spontaneous expressive speech. Proceeding of 1st International Congress of Phonetics and Phonology, Japan; 2002

  32. Zharkova NN. Acquisition of prosody in Russian. 2002 Department of Phonetics, State University of St. Petersburg, Russia; In SP-2002, 735–738

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stocksmeier T, Kopp S, Gibbon D. Synthesis of prosodic attitudinal variants in German backchannel ‘ja’. Proceedings of Interspeech; 27–31 August 2007; Antwerp, Belgium; 2007. p. 1290–1293

  34. Brown Schmidt S, Byron DK, Tanenhaus MK. Beyond salience: interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns. J Mem Lang. 2005;53:292–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wolters M, Byron D. Prosody and the resolution of pronominal anaphora. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING00); 2000; 2:919–925. Saarbruken

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sobol Shikler T. Analysis of affective expression in speech. United Kingdom JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge University; 2009. p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Johnston T, Scherer RP. Vocal communication of emotion. In: Lewis M, Haviland Jones JM, editors. Handbook emotion. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2000. pp. 220–235.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bod R, Hay J, Jannedy S. Probability theory in linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalia M. Osman.

Additional information

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahgat, M.B.A., Khaled, A.M., Aziz, A.A. et al. Studying some elicited verbal prosodic patterns in Egyptian children. Egypt J Otolaryngol 28, 242–250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000418004.75823.4e

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000418004.75823.4e

Keywords