- Original article
- Open Access
Arabic psycholinguistic screening tool: a preliminary study
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 28, pages 64–73 (2012)
Psycholinguistics or the psychology of language refers to the study of the psychological and neurobiological factors that enable humans to acquire, use, and understand language.
This work aimed at designing and applying an Arabic Psycholinguistic Screening Tool on a group of native Egyptian students aged 7 through 9, 11 years old, enrolled in primary grade 1 through primary grade 4, and analyzing the obtained results in order to attain a better understanding of psycholinguistic skills in the studied age range and preliminarily study the constituent items of the tool.
Participants and methods
The sample in this study included 45 healthy native Arabic-speaking Egyptian children: 25 boys and 20 girls. The groups were as follows: group I (from 7 to 7; 11 years old), group II (from 8 to 8; 11 years old), and group III (from 9 to 9; 11 years old). They were attending regular classes in schools following the Egyptian Arabic National curriculum. The participants were enrolled in primary grade 1 through primary grade 4. Children were randomly selected from a cluster of children reported to be subjectively free from any hearing difficulties, delayed language development, medical problems, and intellectual, social, psychiatric, psychological, or serious academic difficulties. Psycholinguistic abilities for each child were evaluated using the Arabic Psycholinguistic Screening Tool designed in the current study. Tested parameters included oral similarity, morphological closure, proper word and nonsense word repetition, phonological deletion, phonological rhyming awareness and production, spoken and written vocabulary, sequencing events, sight and sound decoding, in addition to sight and sound spelling. The results obtained were then analyzed using descriptive, comparative, correlation, reliability, and validity studies.
The results reflected internal consistency as well as the content, construct, and convergent validity of the Psycholinguistic Screening Tool for children aged 7 through 9; 11 years for those items covering oral similarity, morphological closure, proper word repetition, spoken and written vocabulary, proper word repetition, spoken and written vocabulary, sequencing of events, sight and sound decoding, and sound spelling. Although nonsense word repetition, sight spelling, phonological rhyming awareness, and production subtests were found to have convergent validity as well as internal consistency, statistical studies did not quite prove their construct validity.
Conclusion and recommendations
(a) The phonological rhyming awareness and production as well as nonsense word repetition and sight spelling subtests should be revised taking into consideration the Arabic educational curriculum applied in Egyptian schools. (b) Further studies should be carried out on the Arabic Screening Tool to study predictive validity on a larger group of children. (c) Studies should be carried out using the Arabic Psycholinguistic Screening Tool on a group of children with learning disabilities to examine its diagnostic sensitivity.
Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108: 204–256
Tanenhaus MK, Spivey Knowlton MJ, Eberhard KM, Sedivy JC. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 1995; 268: 1632–1634
Horace Bidwell English. A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytical terms. 9th ed. New York: David McKay Company Inc.; 1968.
Packard JL Chinese words and the lexicon The morphology of Chinese: a linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 284–309.
Hammill DD, Mather N, Roberts R. ITPA-3: Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities. 3rd ed Austin, TX: Urbana University of Illinois; 2001.
McLoughlin JA, Lewis RB Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary. 10th ed. New York: Merriam-Webster Inc.; 1993.
Lenneberg EH Language development in mongoloid children Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley; 1967. pp. 309–328
House E The random house dictionary. New York, USA: Random House Inc.; 2010.
Rosner J, Simon D. The auditory analysis test: an initial report. J Learn Disabil. 1971; 4: 384–392
Castles A, Coltheart M. Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition. 1993; 47: 149–180
Vellutino FR, Scanlon DA, Tanzman MS. Components of reading ability: issues and problems in operational word identification, phonological coding. Baltimo: Brookes; 1994.
Newcomer PL. Diagnostic assessment battery. 3rd ed. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 2001.
Odisho EY Techniques of teaching comparative pronunciation in Arabic and English. Piscataway, New Jersey: Gorgias Pr Llc; 2005.
Benner JA. Learn biblical hebrew: a guide to learning the Hebrew alphabet, vocabulary and sentence structure of the hebrew bible. College Station, TX: Virtualbookworm.com Publishing; 2004.
Crystal D. The cambridge encyclopedia of language. 2nd ed Edinburgh, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Azza AA, Gad Alla MA, Shoubary AM, Abdel Wahab Standardization and modification of illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities on Egyptian children. Cairo, Egypt: Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University; 2007.
Tomblin JB, Morris HL, Spriestersbach DC Diagnosis in speech-language pathology. Albany, NY: Singular; 2000.
Stuart M. Processing strategies in a phoneme deletion task. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990; 42: 305–327
Meeker WQ, Escobar LA. Statistical methods for reliability data. 1st ed Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience; 1998.
Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993; 78: 98–104
Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess. 1996; 8: 350–353
Zinbarg RE, Yovel I, Revelle W, McDonald RP. Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale’s indicators: a comparison of estimators for ωh. Appl Psychol Meas. 2006; 30: 121–144
McDonalds RP. Test theory: a unified treatment. Department of Psychology, Birbeck College, London Psychology Press; 1999.
Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, W Li. Cronbach’s α Revelle’s β and McDonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005; 70: 123–133
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Aziz, A.A., Shaheen, E.A., Osman, D.M. et al. Arabic psycholinguistic screening tool: a preliminary study. Egypt J Otolaryngol 28, 64–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000411080.90712.1c
- developmental psycholinguistics
- psycholinguistic assessment
- psycholinguistic screening
- psycholinguistics in Arabic language