Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Download PDF

Prosodic assessment in Egyptian children with specific language impairment

The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 28, pages 56–63 (2012)Cite this article

En

Abstract

Background

Prosody is the aspect of language that conveys emotion by changes in tone, rhythm, and emphasis during speech. Prosody includes aspects such as intonation and tone of voice. Specific language impairment (SLI) is a developmental disorder in which language development is below the chronological age despite normal nonverbal intelligence and no obvious neurological or physiological impairments or emotional and/or social difficulties that could impact language use. Most of these children experience considerable difficulty in language comprehension and/or production and experience specific problems in learning syntactic rules. In the speech stream, boundaries of major syntactic constituents are reliably marked by prosodic cues. Although deficits in related aspects of prosody have been hypothesized to underlie SLI, prosody has been little studied in Egyptian children having SLIs.

Objective

The objective of this work was to assess prosody in Egyptian children with an SLI in order to correlate the results with the clinical profile of the patients so as to choose the proper rehabilitation training program.

Participants and method

This study included 30 Egyptian children with SLIs and 30 normal children as a control group; their ages ranged between 4 and 6 years. Assessment included language assessment using the Arabic language test and prosodic assessment using the protocol of prosodic assessment, which was especially designed to assess prosodic abilities in Arabic-speaking children.

Results

Results revealed a significant difference in most of the individual and total subjective scores of prosodic skills between the control group and children with SLIs. Although the difference in the average of the total objective scores of prosodic assessment, which included pitch and energy, was highly significant, the average of total sentence duration was insignificant. There was significant correlation between the total language age and all subjective scores and an insignificant correlation with the total objective scores of prosodic assessment skills in SLI children.

Conclusion

SLI children have defective receptive, expressive, subjective, and objective scores of prosodic assessment skills that should be considered during the rehabilitation program for language stimulation for these children.

References

  1. Monnot M, Foley R, Ross E. Affective prosody: whence motherese. Behav Brain Sci. 2004; 27: 518–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Samuelsson C. Using conversation analysis to study prosodic problems in a child with language impairment. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2009; 25: 59–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hohle B, Weissenborn J. German-learning infants’ ability to detect unstressed closed-class elements in continuous speech. Dev Sci. 2003; 6: 122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinert S. Deficits in acquiring language structure: the importance of using prosodic cues. Appl Cognit Psychol. 1992; 6: 545–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher J, Plante E, Vance R, Gerken L, Glattke TJ. Do children and adults with language impairment recognize prosodic cues? J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50: 746–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stojanovik V, Setter JE. Conditions in which prosodic impairments occur. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009; 11: 293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kotby MN, Khairy A, Baraka M, Rifaie N, El Shobary A Language testing of Arabic speaking children. Proceeding of the XXIII World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics; 1995

  8. Bahgat MA, Khaled A, Aziz AA, Ahmed DM, Azab SN Prosodic development in normal Arabic speaking children. The 1st National Congress of the Egyptian Society of the Phoniatrics and Logopedics; 4–5 May; Cairo, Egypt; 2011

  9. Terman LM, Merrill MA Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: manual for the Third Revision Form L-M. London: Harrap; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dlouha O, Novak A, Vokral J. Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) in children with specific language impairment (SLI). Central auditory tests. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 71: 903–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith MD Childhood language disorders. 1st ed New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shriberg E, Bates R, Stolcke AKokkinakis G, Fakotakis N, Dermatas E. A prosody-only decision-tree model for disfluency detection. Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. 1997 Rhodes, Greece:2383–2386

  13. Leonard LB Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rice ML, Spitz RV, O’Brien M. Semantic and morphosyntactic language outcomes in biologically at-risk children. J Neurolinguistics. 1999; 12: 213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinert S, Mueller K, Aschersleben G. Language and short-term memory problems of specifically language impaired children: are rhythmic prosodic deficits a cause? 2000 Rhytmus Ein interdisziplinres Handbuch Huber:255–283

  16. Weinert S, Müller C. Prosody and sentence processing: Does an exaggerated sentence prosody support language processing in specifically language impaired children? Z Entwicklungspsychol Padag Psychol. 1996; 28: 228–256

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bishop DVM. Motor immaturity and specific speech and language impairment: evidence for a common genetic basis. Am J Med Genet. 2002; 114: 56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel R, Grigos MI. Acoustic characterization of the question-statement contrast in 4, 7 and 11 year-old children. Speech Commun. 2006; 48: 1308–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wells B, Peppe S, Goulandris N. Intonation development from five to thirteen. J Child Lang. 2004; 31: 749–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonard LB, Eyer JA, Bedore LM, Grela BG. Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English speaking children specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40: 741–753

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montgomery JW. Information processing and language comprehension in children with specific language impairment. Topics Lang Disord. 2001; 22: 62–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wells B, Local J. The sense of an ending: a case of prosodic delay. Clin Linguist Phon. 1993; 7: 59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Der Meulen S, Janssen P, Os ED. Prosodic abilities in children with specific language impairment. J Commun Disord. 1997;30:155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McGregor KK, Leonard LB. Subject pronoun and article omissions in the speech of children with specific language impairment: a phonological interpretation. J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37: 171–181

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goffman L. Kinematic differentiation of prosodic categories in normal and disordered language development. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47: 1088–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Snow D. Prosodic markers of syntactic boundaries in the speech of 4-year-old children with normal and disordered language development. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41: 1158–1170

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Webster RI, Majnemer A, Platt RW, Shevell MI. Motor function at school age in children with a preschool diagnosis of developmental language impairment. J Pediatr. 2005; 146: 80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tannock R, Brown T Attention deficit disorders with learning disorders in children and adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Webster RI, Shevell MI. Neurobiology of specific language impairment. J Child Neurol. 2004; 19: 471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McCann J, Peppé S, Gibbon FE, O’Hare A, Rutherford M. Prosody and its relationship to language in school-aged children with high-functioning autism. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007; 42: 682–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheek A, Cormier K, Repp A, Meier RP. Prelinguistic gesture predicts mastery and error in the production of early signs. Language. 2001; 77: 292–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luckasson R, Borthwick-Duffy S, Buntinx W, Coulter D, Caraig E, Reeve A. 10th edition of the AAMR reference manual. 2002

  33. Locke JL. Gradual emergence of developmental language disorders. J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37: 608–616

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fisher J, Plante E, Vance R, Gerken L, Glattke TJ. Do children and adults with language impairment recognize prosodic cues? J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50: 746–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wells B, Peppe S. Intonation abilities of children with speech and language impairments. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46: 5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Crary MA. Production of linguistic prosody by normal and speech-disordered children. J Commun Disord. 1993; 26: 245–262

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alt M, Plante E, Creusere M. Semantic features in fast-mapping: performance of preschoolers with specific language impairment versus preschoolers with normal language. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47: 407–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Phoniatric Unit, ENT Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Elham A. Shaheen & Sahar S. Shohdi

  2. Phoniatric Unit, ENT Department, Faculty of Medicine, Bani Suef University, Bani Sweif, Egypt

    Nader N. Ahmed & Heba Ashour

Authors
  1. Elham A. Shaheen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sahar S. Shohdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nader N. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heba Ashour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham A. Shaheen.

Additional information

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaheen, E.A., Shohdi, S.S., Ahmed, N.N. et al. Prosodic assessment in Egyptian children with specific language impairment. Egypt J Otolaryngol 28, 56–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000411076.60229.ab

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7123/01.EJO.0000411076.60229.ab

Keywords

  • expressive language
  • intonation
  • prosody
  • receptive language
  • rhythm
  • specific language impairment
  • stress