Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Download PDF
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Assessment of the preoperative computed tomographic predictability for round window membrane visibility and accessibility during cochlear implant surgery

The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 35, pages 278–287 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to assess the preoperative predictability of multi-slice computed tomography for round window membrane (RWM) visibility and accessibility through round window niche (RWN) intraoperatively. Patients and methods

Computed tomographic scans of 61 adult cochlear implant patients with otherwise normal temporal bone anatomy were studied for RWN extent using two methods. The first was a modification of a method by Park and colleagues and another simple method proposed by our group. The visibility of the RWN through RWN was assessed intraoperatively after performing the posterior tympanotomy and good exposure of the RWN. Statistical analysis was then performed.

Results

Modified Park and colleagues method was statistically significant in predicting RWM visibility (P=0.018) and a cutoff point was detected at more than or equal to 0.7 with a specificity of 69.23% for low or no visibility of RWM. Our proposed method was also statistically significant (P=0.001) with a cutoff point of more than or equal to 1.43mm with a specificity of 96.15%.

Discussion

RWN depth has been studied repeatedly in the literature with only rarely correlation to intraoperative findings. These methods were also frequently either cadaveric or radiological with complex reconstruction, thus were with doubtful clinical value. In the present study, two methods were used and were found to be significant to predict the degree of visibility of RWN visibility through RWM.

Conclusion

The modified Park’s and our proposed methods can statistically significantly predict RWM visibility through RWN. However, our proposed method had higher specificity and smaller P value.

References

  1. Connor SEJ. Contemporary imaging of auditory implants. Clin Radiol 2018; 73:19–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Toth M, Alpar A, Bodon G, Moser G, Patonay L. Surgical anatomy of the cochlea for cochlear implantation. Ann Anat 2006; 188:363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavinsky-Wolff M, Lavinsky L, Dall’Igna C, Lavinsky J, Setogutti E, Viletti MC. Transcanal cochleostomy in cochlear implant surgery: long-term results of a cohort study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 78:118–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee DH, Kim JK, Seo JH, Lee BJ. Anatomic limitations of posterior tympanotomy: what is the major radiologic determinant for the view field through posterior tympanotomy? J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23:817–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Takahashi H, Takagi A, Sando I. Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement of the round window and its membrane. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 101:517–521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Proctor B, Bollobas B, Niparko JK. Anatomy of the round window niche. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95 (Part 1):444–446.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toth M, Alpar A, Patonay L, Olah I. Development and surgical anatomy of the round window niche. Ann Anat 2006; 188:93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Atturo F, Barbara M, Rask-Andersen H. On the anatomy of the ‘hook’ region of the human cochlea and how it relates to cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2014; 19:378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Adunka O, Gstoettner W, Hambek M, Unkelbach MH, Radeloff A, Kiefer J. Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2004; 66:306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuccar E, Tekdemir I, Aslan A, Elhan A, Deda H. Radiological anatomy of the intratemporal course of facial nerve. Clin Anat 2000; 13:83–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Palabiyik FB, Hacikurt K, Yazici Z. Facial nerve anomalies in paediatric cochlear implant candidates: radiological evaluation. J Laryngol Otol 2017; 131:26–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leong AC, Jiang D, Agger A, Fitzgerald-O’Connor A. Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270:1237–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mackeith S, Joy R, Robinson P, Hajioff D. Pre-operative imaging for cochlear implantation: magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or both? Cochlear Implants Int 2012; 13:133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahni D, Singla A, Gupta A, Gupta T, Aggarwal A. Relationship of cochlea with surrounding neurovascular structures and their implication in cochlear implantation. Surg Radiol Anat 2015; 37:913–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Woolley AL, Oser AB, Lusk RP, Bahadori RS. Preoperative temporal bone computed tomography scan and its use in evaluating the pediatric cochlear implant candidate. Laryngoscope 1997; 107:1100–1106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fouad YA, Elaassar AS, El-Anwar MW, Sabir E, Abdelhamid A, Ghonimy M. Role of multislice CT imaging in predicting the visibility of the round window in pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38:1097–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasaballah MSHTA. Evaluation of facial nerve course, posterior tympanotomy width and visibility of round window in patients with cochlear implantation by performing oblique sagittal cut computed tomographic scan temporal bone. Egypt J Otolaryngol 2014; 30: 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Casselman JW, Gieraerts K, Volders D, Delanote J, Mermuys K, De Foer B, et al. Cone beam CT: non-dental applications. JBR-BTR 2013; 96:333–353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guldner C, Diogo I, Bernd E, Drager S, Mandapathil M, Teymoortash A, et al. Visualization of anatomy in normal and pathologic middle ears by cone beam CT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:737–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Karino S, Kakigi A, Iwasaki S, Yamasoba T. Predicting round window niche visibility via the facial recess using high-resolution computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36: e18–e23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elzayat S, Mandour M, Lotfy R, Mahrous A. Predicting round window visibility during cochlear implantation using high resolution CT scan. J Int Adv Otol 2018; 14:15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Panda NKM, Patro SK, Saran S, Nayak G. Evaluation of round window accessibility for electrode insertion: validation study from two centers. J Otolaryngol ENT Res 2017; 8:00263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen D, Blinder G, Perez R, Raveh D. Standardized computed tomographic imaging and dimensions of the round-window niche. Int Tinnitus J 2005; 11:158–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park E, Amoodi H, Kuthubutheen J, Chen JM, Nedzelski JM, Lin VY. Predictors of round window accessibility for adult cochlear implantation based on pre-operative CT scan: a prospective observational study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 44:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nomura Y. Otological significance of the round window. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1984; 33:1–162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007; 117:1397–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shakeel M, Spielmann PM, Jones SE, Hussain SS. Direct measurement of the round window niche dimensions using a 3-dimensional moulding technique –a human cadaveric temporal bone study. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40:657–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lloyd SK, Kasbekar AV, Kenway B, Prevost T, Hockman M, Beale T, et al. Developmental changes in cochlear orientation-implications for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:902–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li PM, Wang H, Northrop C, Merchant SN, Nadol JB Jr. Anatomy of the round window and hook region of the cochlea with implications for cochlear implantation and other endocochlear surgical procedures. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28:641–648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Franz BK, Clark GM, Bloom DM. Surgical anatomy of the round window with special reference to cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:97–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 72 Ahmed Shawky Street, 21523, Alexandria, Egypt

    Ahmed Galal MBBCH, MSC, PHD in ORL/HNS & Fatthi Baki

  2. Departments of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    Omneya G. Eldin

  3. Departments of Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Neuro-Otology, Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Rome, Italy

    Mario Sanna

Authors
  1. Ahmed Galal MBBCH, MSC, PHD in ORL/HNS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omneya G. Eldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatthi Baki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario Sanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Galal MBBCH, MSC, PHD in ORL/HNS.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galal, A., Eldin, O.G., Baki, F. et al. Assessment of the preoperative computed tomographic predictability for round window membrane visibility and accessibility during cochlear implant surgery. Egypt J Otolaryngol 35, 278–287 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejo.ejo_4_19

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejo.ejo_4_19

Keywords