Skip to main content

Correction of prominent ear by the two parallel incision technique with definition and folding of the antihelix by vertical mattress sutures

Abstract

Background

Multiple techniques have been advocated over the years for correction of the prominent ear. The basic techniques used to correct prominent ears with a missing antihelix depends on incision, scoring, bending and reposition of the auricular cartilages. This study was undertaken to correct prominent ears using cartilage incision and vertical mattress sutures to define antihelix.

Patients and Methods

This study was carried out on 13 patients (25 ears) in the period between February 2014 and June 2017, twelve patients of them were presented with bilateral prominent ears and one patient was presented with unilateral prominent (bat) ear. This series comprised 8 males and 5 females. Their ages ranged between 7 to 33 years. In this technique 2 parallel incision in auricular cartilage, definition of antihelix with vertical mattress sutures and ellipse of skin was removed.

Results

Satisfactory results were obtained in all patients. Complications occurred in 2 patients only: one of them had mild protrusion of upper third of auricle and the other had keloid.

Conclusion

Our technique produces natural-looking of the operated ears with low complication rates.

References

  1. 1

    Posnick J. Aesthetic alteration of prominent ears: evaluation and surgery. In: Principles and practice of orthognathic surgery, Saunders, 2014; Chapter 39:1703–1745.

  2. 2

    Azuara E. Aesthetic otoplasty with remodeling of the antihelix for the correction of the prominent ear. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000; 2:57–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Purcell E, O’Neill A, Regan P. A different type of ‘glue ear’: report of an unusual case of prominent ears. Ear Nose Throat 2003; 82:702–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Haytoglu S, Haytoglu T, Muluk N, Kuran G, Arikan O. Comparison of two incisionless otoplasty techniques for prominent ears in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79:504–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Firmin F, Sanger C, Otoole G. Ear reconstruction following severe complication of otoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61:513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Handler E, Song T, Shih C. Complications of otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2013; 21:653–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Nolst G. Otoplasty: a modified anterior scoring technique. Facial Plast Surg 2004; 20:277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Anesti K, Moss A. Otoplasty morbidity. Mod Plast Surg 2013; 1:28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Janis J, Rohrich R, Gutowski K. Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115:60e–72e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Campbell A. Otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21:310–316.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Dieffenbach J. Otoplasty training. the operative surgery. Leipzig: Brockhaus; 1848. 395.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    McDowell A. Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 41:17–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Chao B, Chung H, Park J. Surgical correction of prominent ear using modified tube technique and posterior approach. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14:767–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Zayed E, Hegazy H. Correction of prominenant ear by the use of y-shaped cartilage strip, assisted conchal reduction technique. Egypt J Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 31:139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Mustarde J. The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg 1963; 16:170–178.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Adamson P, McGraw B, Tropper G. Otoplasty: critical review of clinical results. Laryngoscope 1991; 101:883–888.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramez Reda MD.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaled, A., Reda, R., Kamel, A. et al. Correction of prominent ear by the two parallel incision technique with definition and folding of the antihelix by vertical mattress sutures. Egypt J Otolaryngol 34, 217–223 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejo.ejo_48_18

Download citation

Keywords

  • antihelix
  • cartilage incision
  • prominent ear
  • vertical mattress suture