Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Download PDF

Assessment protocol for patients with acquired apraxia of speech

The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 33, pages 528–534 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Apraxia of speech can be defined as an articulation disorder that results from impairment of the capacity to order the positioning of speech musculature and the sequencing of muscle movements for volitional production of phonemes and sequences of phonemes.

Objective

The aim of this study was to adapt the Apraxia Battery for Adults II (ABA II) test to suit the Egyptian culture in order to apply this test for assessing Egyptian apraxic patients for proper management of this ailment.

Subjects and methods

This study was conducted on two groups: the first group consisted of 56 adult patients with expressive aphasia and/or dysarthria, who were evaluated with ABA II to detect any apraxic elements. The second group consisted of 100 healthy adults who served as the control group and were evaluated by ABA II to yield cutoff scores. Test reliability was assessed by internal consistency reliability using reliability coefficient α (Cronbach’s α). Test validity was measured on the basis of content validity, concurrent validity, and group differentiation.

Results

Reliability of the ABA II test was proved to be high, on the basis of the high values of coefficient α obtained for all test items (0.746–0.937), denoting an intercorrelation between test items. Validity of the ABA II was proven by three methods: content validity, concurrent validity (correlation matrix between different items of the test was determined and there was a strong correlation between the test items), and group differentiation (comparison of the test results between apraxic patients, nonapraxic patients, and controls was done and statistically significant differences were found between the scores of all test items among these groups.) The test was proven to be sensitive and specific.

Conclusion

The results were highly significant and were capable of discriminating between normal subjects and apraxic patients.

References

  1. Heilman KM, Rothi LJ. Apraxia. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Clinical neuropsychology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders. St Louis: Mosby; 1995. 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan AT, Vogel AP. A review of treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 45:103–110.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vargha-Khadem F, Gadian DG, Copp A, Mishkin M. FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6:131–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maassen B. Issues contrasting adult acquired versus developmental apraxia of speech. Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23:257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Josephs KA, Duffy JR, Strand EA, Whitwell JL, Layton KF, Parisi JE. Clinicopathological and imaging correlates of progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. Brain 2006; 129:1385–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricci M, Magarelli M, Todino V, Bianchini A, Calandriello E, Tramutoli R. Progressive apraxia of speech presenting as isolated disorder of speech articulation and prosody: a case report. Neurocase 2008; 14:162–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillis AE, Work M, Barker PB, Jacobs MA, Breese EL, Maurer K. Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain 2004; 127:1479–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogar J, Willock S, Baldo J, Wilkins D, Ludy C, Dronkers N. Clinical and anatomical correlates of apraxia of speech. Brain Lang 2006; 97: 343–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Square PA, Roy AE, Martin RE. Apraxia of speech: another form of praxis disruption. In: Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Apraxia: the neuropsychology of action. East Sussex: Psychology Press; 1997. 173–206.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wertz RT, LaPointe LL, Rosenbek JC. Apraxia of speech: the disorders and its management. New York: Grune and Stratton 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McNeil MR, Pratt SR, Fossett TR. The differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. In Maassen B. Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech. New York: Oxford University Press 2004. 11 223–230.

  13. Robin DA, Solomon NP, Moon JB, Folkins JW. Nonspeech assessment of the speech production mechanism. In McNeil MR. Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders. New York: Thieme 1997. 49–62

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hartelius L, Svensson P, Bubach A. Clinical assessment of dysarthria: performance on a dysarthria test by normal adult subjects and by individuals with Parkinson’s disease or with multiple sclerosis. Scand J Logop Phoniatr 1993; 18:131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kotby MN, Mostafa ME, Bonowby MH, Baraka MA. Modified scoring system for testing language disability in dysphasic patients. HNO Praxis Leipezing 1981; 6:194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dabul B. Apraxia Battery for Adults. 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-Ed; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haley KL, Ohde RN, Wertz RT. Vowel quality in aphasia and apraxia of speech: phonetic transcription and formant analyses. Aphasiology 2001; 15:1107–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard S, Varley RA, Rosemary A. EPG in therapy, using electropalatography to treat severe acquired apraxia of speech. Int J Lang Commun Disord 1995; 30:246–255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wambaugh J. A summary of treatments for apraxia of speech and review of replicated approaches. In: McNeil MR. Seminars in speech and language. Apraxia of speech: from concept to clinic. New York: Thieme 2002. 293–308

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kotby MN, Bassiouny S, El-Zomor M, Mohsen E. Standard isolation of an articulation test. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Ain Shams Medical Congress; Cairo, Egypt, March 1986.

  21. Meleka LK. Stanford Binet scale. 4th edition. 1998.

  22. Linda B, Rita J, Shrbenou XX, Johnsen SK. Test of non verbal intelligence. 2nd ed. UK; 1990.

  23. Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders: substrates, differential diagnosis and management 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2005. 260–281.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Engelter S, Gostynski M, Papa S. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke. incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke 2006; 37:1379–1384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Odell KH, Shriberg LD. Prosody-voice characteristics of children and adults with apraxia of speech. Clin Linguist Phon 2001; 15:275–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Varley RA, Whiteside SP, Luff H. Apraxia of speech as a disruption of word-level schemata: some durational evidence. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 1999; 7:127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ballard KJ, Granier JP, Robin DA. Toward a new understanding of apraxia of speech: theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 969–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Phoniatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, 12 Street Elnahda Roushdy, Alexandria, Egypt

    Yehia Amin Aboras & Reham Mohamed Elmaghraby (Assistant Professor of Phoniatrics)

  2. Neuropsychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt

    Ghada Abdelhady Ashmawy

  3. Unit of Phoniatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt

    Sabah Saeed Gommaa

Authors
  1. Yehia Amin Aboras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ghada Abdelhady Ashmawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reham Mohamed Elmaghraby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabah Saeed Gommaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reham Mohamed Elmaghraby.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aboras, Y.A., Ashmawy, G.A., Elmaghraby, R.M. et al. Assessment protocol for patients with acquired apraxia of speech. Egypt J Otolaryngol 33, 528–534 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.206018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.206018

Keywords