- Original article
- Open Access
Edge frequency effect on speech recognition in patients with steep-slope hearing loss
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 33, pages111–119(2017)
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of edge frequency on speech recognition after nonlinear frequency compression (NFC) using Arabic consonant speech discrimination lists.
Patients and methods
The study was conducted on 20 adult literate patients with bilateral steep-slope high-frequency sensory–neural hearing loss. Patients were subjected to history taking, ear examination, puretone audiometry, and threshold equalizing noise (HL) test to estimate cochlear dead regions. They were divided into four groups according to the edge frequency. Speech recognition was evaluated using modified Arabic consonant discrimination lists before and after amplification with NFC at three settings that differed in cutoff frequency of compression using the same hearing aid. Free field aided thresholds were obtained in every setting.
Patients showed improvement in aided thresholds when the cutoff frequency was lowered. Speech recognition evaluation showed that the extent of dead regions has a marked impact on patients’ speech recognition score. Patients with the lowest edge frequencyobtainedtheworstspeechrecognitionscoreandleastbenefitfromlowering the cutoff frequency, unlike those patients with the highest edge frequency who had better speech recognition and benefitted more from the highest cutoff frequency.
Identifying edge frequency in NFC is important, especially in those patients with steep-slope configuration, as the lower the edge frequency, the poorer the performance. In contrast, satisfactory amplification is reached when the cutoff frequency is at or near the edge frequency.
Pittman AL, Stelmachowicz PG, Lewis DE, Hoover BM. Spectral characteristics of speech at the earimplications for amplification in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46:649–657.
Ching TY, Dillon H, Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103:1128–1140.
Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 104:432–441.
Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res 2004; 188:70–88.
Moore BC. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004; 25:98–116.
Moore BCJ. Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5:1–34.
Moore BC, Huss M, Vickers DA, Glasberg BR, Alcantara JI. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34:205–224.
Baer T, Moore BC, Kluk K. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112(Pt 1):1133–1144.
Vickers DA, Moore BC, Baer T. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110:1164–1175.
Simpson A, Hersbach AA, McDermott HJ. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device. Int J Audiol 2005; 44:281–292.
Simpson A, Hersbach AA, McDermott HJ. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. Int J Audiol 2006; 45:619–629.
Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E, Nyffeler M, Boretzki M, Caraway T, et al. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2011; 50:396–404.
Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E, Nyffeler M, Boretzki M, Caraway T. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21:618–628.
Glista D, Scollie S, Bagatto M, Seewald R, Parsa V, Johnson A. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol 2009; 48:632–644.
Bohnert A, Nyffeler M, Keilmann A. Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 267:1045–1053.
Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Stone MA. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25:478–487.
Soliman S. Speech discrimination audiometry using-Arabic phonetically-balanced words. Ain Shams Med J 1976; 27:27–30.
El Ghazaly MM, Talaat MA, Mourad MI. Evaluation of speech perception in patients with ski slope hearing loss using Arabic consonant speech discrimination lists. Adv Arab Acad Audiovestibul J 2014; 1:32–37.
Cox RM, Johnson JA, Alexander GC. Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss. Ear Hear 2012; 33:573–587.
Vinay, Moore BC. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 2007; 28:231–241.
Moore BCJ, Huss M, Vickers DA, Glasberg BR, Alcantara JI. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34:205–224.
Hazzaa N, Hassan DM, Hassan A. Evaluation of non-linear frequency compression hearing aids using speech P1-cortical auditory evoked potential. Hear Bal Comm 2016; 14:36–43.
Souza PE, Arehart KH, Kates JM, Croghan NBH, Gehani N. Exploring the limitsof frequency lowering. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56:1349–1363.
Vestergaard MD. Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42:249–261.
Moore BC, Vinay SN. Enhanced discrimination of low-frequency sounds for subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Brain 2009; 132(Pt 2):524–536.
Hornsby BW, Johnson EE, Picou E. Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding. Ear Hear 2011; 32:543–555.
Alexander JM. Nonlinear frequency compression: Influence of start frequency and input bandwidth on consonant and vowel recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2016; 139:938–957.
McCreery RW, Alexander J, Brennan MA, Hoover B, Kopun J, Stelmachowicz PG. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss. Ear Hear 2014; 35:440–447.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
About this article
Cite this article
Salem, M.S.A., Talaat, M.A. & Mourad, M.I. Edge frequency effect on speech recognition in patients with steep-slope hearing loss. Egypt J Otolaryngol 33, 111–119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.199416
- cochlear dead region
- nonlinear frequency compression
- steep sloping sensory–neural hearing loss
- threshold equalizing noise (hl)