- Original article
- Open Access
Powered turbinoplasty versus powered turbinectomy: a comparative study
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 33, pages9–14(2017)
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of powered turbinoplasty with those of powered turbinectomy.
Materials and methods
Forty patients suffering from hypertrophied inferior turbinate that resisted ordinary medical treatment were randomly divided into two equal groups. One group was managed with powered turbinoplasty and the other with powered turbinectomy. The patients were followed up for 6 weeks postoperatively.
After 6 weeks the total success in reducing the size of the turbinate and postoperative blood clots was the same (100%) for both groups but it was 100% for powered turbinoplasty and 80% for powered turbinectomy in the occurrence of postoperative crustations.
Powered turbinoplasty is a promising surgical procedure for inferior turbinate surgery. This procedure achieves optimum turbinate reduction with less complications in patients with respect to bleeding, occurrence of crustations, blood clots, and nasal discharge postoperatively.
Gottarelli P. Modified inferior turbinoplasty; Italy: Rhinoplasty Surgeon Bologna; 2012. 3–50.
Friedman M, Vidyasagar R. Surgical management of septal deformity, turbinate hypertrophy, nasal valve collapse and choanal atresia. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlands SD, editors. Head & neck surgery - otolaryngology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2006. 1: 328–330.
Hol MK, Huizing EH. Treatment of inferior turbinate pathology: a review and critical evaluation of the different techniques. Rhinology 2000; 38:157–166.
Setcliff RC, Parsons DS. The hummer: new instrumentation for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 1994; 8:275–277.
Lee KC, Hwang PH, Kingdom TT. Surgical management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy in the office: three mucosal sparing techniques. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 12:107–111.
Wormald P-J. Endoscopic sinus surgery anatomy, three-dimensional reconstruction, and surgical technique 3rd ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publisher; 2013; 19–27.
Passali D, Passali FM, Damiani V, et al. Treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003; 112:683–688.
Wengraf CL, Gleeson MJ, Siodlak MZ. The stuffy nose: a comparative study of two common methods of treatment. Clin Otolaryngol 1986; 11:61–68.
Davis WE, Nishioka GJ. Endoscopic partial inferior turbinectomy using a power microcutting instrument. Ear Nose Throat J 1996; 75:49–50.
Friedman M, Tanyeri H, Lim J, et al. A safe, alternative technique for inferior turbinate reduction. Laryngoscope 1999; 109:1834–1837.
Mori S, Fujieda S, Yamada T, et al. Long-term effect of submucous turbinectomy in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:865–869.
Kassab AN, Rifaat M, Madian Y. Comparative study of management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy using turbinoplasty assisted by microdebrider or 980nm diode laser. J Laryngol Otol 2012; 126:1231–1237.
Joniau S, Wong I, Rajapaksa S, Carney SA, Wormald P-J. Long-term comparison between submucosal cauterization and powered reduction of the inferior turbinates Laryngoscope 2006; 116:1612–1616.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
About this article
Cite this article
Ibrahim, S.G., Kamel, A.A., El-Fouly, M.S. et al. Powered turbinoplasty versus powered turbinectomy: a comparative study. Egypt J Otolaryngol 33, 9–14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.199402