Skip to main content

Influence of BMI and head circumference on variables of auditory evoked potential in young healthy male human participants




Age, hearing loss, sex, BMI, and head size are very important parameters that influence auditory evoked potential (AEP) variables. Although the correlation of BMI and head size with AEP parameters has been studied recently, there is no common consensus on it. A few studies show a positive correlation, whereas others report a weaker correlation. Further, normative values of the V/I ratio also show a wide range of normative values from different studies.

Aims and objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the association of AEP variables with BMI and head size in healthy young male participants and to collect normative data for the V/I amplitude ratio.

Materials and methods

This is a cross-sectional study in which 30 young healthy male participants with age range 19–25 years and BMI range 15–26 kg/m2 underwent AEP testing. All were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria established for the study. Informed consent was obtained and the data obtained were stored in an Excel sheet. A simple correlation regression coefficient was obtained between physical parameters and different AEP variables.


We observed a strong positive correlation between head size and V wave latency (r = 0.5) and a weaker positive correlation between head size and AEP interpeak latencies (IPLs) I–V and III–V (r = 0.3). No correlation was observed between BMI and AEP variables. The V/I amplitude ratio was 0.98 ± 0.68 and 0.93 ± 0.7 for the left and the right ear, respectively.


We concluded that BMI had no influence, and head size showed an association with AEP outcome, especially V wave latency and the AEP-IPL difference. The V/I ratio needs to be examined further in studies with larger sample sizes as values were different from those of previous studies.


  1. 1

    Katz J. Brainstem evoked responses audiometry. In: Katz J, editor Handbook of clinical audiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Harinder JS, Ramsarup S, Sharanjit K. The study of age and sex related changes in the brainstem auditory evoked potential. J Clin Diagn Res 2010; 4: 3495–3499.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Allison T, Wood CC, Goff WR. Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55: 619–636.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Dehan CP, Jerger J. Analysis of the gender differences in the auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 18–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Trune DR, Mitchell C, Phillips DS. The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1988; 32: 165–174.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Solanki JD, Joshi N, Mehta HB, Shah CJ. A study of gender head circumference and BMI as a variable affecting BAEP results. Indian J Otol 2012; 18: 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Sand T. BAEP amplitudes and amplitude ratios: relation to click polarity, rate, age and sex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 78: 291–296.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Meij BP, Venkerc-van Haagen AJ, van der Brom WE. Relationship between latency of brainstem auditory-evoked potentials and head size in dogs. Vet Q 1992; 14: 121–126.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Dempsey JJ, Censoprano JJ, Mazor M. Relationship between head size and latency of auditory brainstem response. Audiology 1986; 25: 258–262.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Coupland SG, Winkelaar R. The relation between head size and auditory brain-stem response interpeak latency maturation. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2149.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Durrant JD, Sabo D, Hyre RJ. Gender, head size, and ABRs examined in large clinical sample. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Gathe BM, Gandhe MB, Gandhe SM, Puttewar AN, Saraf C, Singh R. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) — a pilot study conducted on young healthy adults from Central India. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: BC16–BC18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Thakur L, Anand JP, Selvamurthy W. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in young urban and rural boys — a comparison. J Environ Biol Acad India 2003; 24: 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Misra UK, J Kalita. Clinical neurophysiology evoked potentials. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2006. 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Aanandha SK, Padma K, Sathya NG, S Kumar. A comparative study of auditory evoked potential in young obese and normal subjects. Int Res J Med Sci 2013; 1: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balaji W. Ghugare MD.

Additional information

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghugare, B.W., Jain, S., Parmar, D.J. et al. Influence of BMI and head circumference on variables of auditory evoked potential in young healthy male human participants. Egypt J Otolaryngol 32, 53–56 (2016).

Download citation


  • auditory evoked potential
  • BMI
  • head size
  • interpeak latency