Skip to main content

Endoscopic-assisted septoplasty versus traditional septoplasty: assessment by the NOSE scale




Nasal obstruction is a very common complaint, which may be caused by various causes, one of the most important being septal deviation. Many techniques have been described to correct these septal deviations since the middle of 19th century. There have been several modifications since its inception. The application of endoscopic techniques to correct septal deformities was initially described by both Lanza and colleagues and by Stammberger in 1991.


Comparing the efficacy of endoscopic septoplasty with traditional septoplasty in the treatment of cases with septal deviations.

Patients and methods

Thirty cases complaining mainly of nasal obstruction due to significant septal deviations were selected. They were randomly divided into two groups: group A patients underwent endoscopic septoplasty and group B underwent traditional septoplasty. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was an important step in assessment.


The two procedures are suitable to correct septal deformities, with a slight upper hand for the endoscope in particular cases. We highlight in this study the advantages and disadvantages of the use of the nasal endoscope to correct nasal septal deviation.


Although mainly used in sinus surgery, the endoscope has also found its way in nasal septal surgery as it facilitates accurate identification of the pathology due to better illumination, improved accessibility to remote areas and magnification. It allows precise resection of the pathological areas without the need of an extended dissection. Endoscopic septoplasty is associated with a significant reduction in the patient’s morbidity in the postoperative period due to limited extent of flap dissection and limited manipulation and resection of the septal framework. However, the endoscope has its own limitations which include loss of binocular vision and the need for frequent cleaning. The NOSE scale also correlates well with the postoperative results of the study.


  1. Siegel NS, Gliklich RE, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122: 228–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cantrell H. Limited septoplasty for endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116: 274–277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maran AGD. Septoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 1974; 88: 393–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marks SC. Nasal and sinus surgery. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 2000. 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nayak DR, Balakrishnan R, Murthy KD. An endoscopic approach to the deviated nasal septum — a preliminary study. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112: 934–939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lanza DC, Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ. Nasal endoscopy & its surgical applications. In: Lee KJ, editor Essential otolaryngology: head & neck surgery. 7th ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. New York: 1999. 407–425.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brain D. The nasal septum. In: Kern AG, editor. Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngology. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997; 4:11/1–11/27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stammberger H. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: the Messerklinger technique. Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1991. 430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giles WC, Gross CW, Abram AC, Greene WM, Avner TG. Endoscopic septoplasty. Laryngoscope 1994; 104: 1507–1509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Park DH, Kim TM, Han DG, Ahn KY. Endoscopic-assisted correction of the deviated nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998; 22: 190–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang PH, McLaughlin RB, Lanza DC, Kennedy DW. Endoscopic septoplasty: indication, technique, and results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120: 678–682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sautter NB, Smith TL. Endoscopic septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009; 42: 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahveci OK, Miman MC, Yucel A, Yucedag F, Okur E, Altuntas A. The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012; 39: 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanclooster C, Jorissen M. Endoscopic septal spur resection in combination with endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1998; 52: 335–335339.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta N. Endoscopic septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 57: 240–240243.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Trimarchi M, Bellini C, Toma S, Bussi M. Back-and-forth endoscopic septoplasty: analysis of the technique and outcomes. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2: 40–4044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherif S. Guindi MD.

Additional information

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guindi, S.S., Mostafa, H.S. & Fawzy, T.O. Endoscopic-assisted septoplasty versus traditional septoplasty: assessment by the NOSE scale. Egypt J Otolaryngol 32, 26–31 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: