- Original Article
- Open access
- Published:
Assessment of nasal tip projection
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 31, pages 105–110 (2015)
En
Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this study was to compare Goode’s and Byrd’s method in objectively assessing nasal tip projection.
Materials and methods
This study included 20 patients from the ENT outpatient clinic, Cairo university hospital, who underwent augmentation tip rhinoplasty, closed technique, using Sheen graft, during the period from January 2008 until December 2011. Two objective methods, Goode’s method and Byrd’s method, were used to assess nasal tip projection preoperatively and postoperatively.
Results
There was statistically significant difference between the gain in projection by Goode’s method compared with Byrd’s method. The mean gain in projection was 11.6 using Goode’s method, whereas it was only 9.55 when measured by Byrd’s method. Goode’s method correlated more with patients’ and surgeon’s subjective assessment and satisfaction.
Conclusion
In our study, Goode’s method proved to be more accurate in representing the final outcome compared with Byrd’s method in the Egyptian population.
References
Vuyk HD, Oakenfull C, Plaat RE. A quantative appraisal of change in nasal tip projection after open rhinoplasty. Rhinology 1997; 35: 124–129.
Sheen JH. Achieving more nasal tip projection by the use of a small autogenous vomer or septal cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 56: 35–40.
Sheen JH. Tip graft: a 20-year retrospective. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 48–63.
Azizzadeh B, Mashkeyich G. Middle Eastern rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18: 201–206.
Goode RL. A method of tip projection measurement. In: Powell HB, editor. Proportions of the esthetic face. New York, NE: Thieme-Stratton Inc.; 1984. 15–39.
Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Rhinoplasty: a practical guide for surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 642–654.
Rohrich RJ, Ghavami A. Rhinoplasty for Middle Eastern noses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1343–1354.
Guyuron B, Jackowe D. Modified tip grafts and tip punch devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 2004–2010.
Sheen JH. Rhinoplasty: personal evolution and milestones. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 1820–1852.
Daniel RK. Middle Eastern rhinoplasty: anatomy, aesthetics, and surgical planning. Facial Plast Surg 26:2010; 110–118.
Devcic Z, Rayikanti BA, Hevia JP, Popenko NA, Karimi K, Wong BJ. Nasal tip projection and facial attractiveness. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 1388–1394.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
ElBestar, M.F., AlMahdy, A.Y. & Gharib, F.M. Assessment of nasal tip projection. Egypt J Otolaryngol 31, 105–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.156093
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.156093