- Original article
- Open Access
Variables affecting speech intelligibility in prelingual Arabic speaking cochlear-implanted children
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 31, pages54–60(2015)
Speech intelligibility (SI) is usually expressed as the degree to which a speaker’s intended message can be recovered by other listeners. It is determined by many factors that may be affected by the degree of hearing loss. The use of cochlear implants (CIs) can facilitate the development of speech and language skills of prelingually deaf children. Thus, improvements in SI after CI fitting can provide indirect evidence of sensory aid benefits.
This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the different variables that affect SI in prelingual CI children in order to achieve the maximum benefit for improving SI in such candidates.
Participants and methods
This study included 30 prelingually hearing-impaired participants, with ages ranging from 6 to 10 years. They used bilateral hearing aids for a duration of 2.6 ± 1.7 years before undergoing CI, which was performed at ages ranging from 4 to 9 years. They were enrolled in specific language intervention programs after implantation for a duration ranging from 1 to 3.8 years. Then, the Arabic Speech Intelligibility test was used to assess their SI. The effect of different variables on their SI was assessed through both comparative and correlative analysis.
SI scores showed highly significant differences in patients at younger age at implantation (aged ≤5years) and in those who had received language therapy for more than 2 years after implantation. Meanwhile, preimplantation therapy for more than 1 year and usage of hearing aids for more than 1 year before CI had significant effects on the SI scores. SI was highly significantly negatively correlated with age at CI and highly significantly positively correlated with the duration of postimplantation therapy. The SI scores were also affected by the three groups of the SI test. The front consonants had higher significant scores compared with both back consonants and sentences, and back consonants had significantly higher scores compared with sentences.
The SI of prelingual cochlear-implanted children was affected by all of the studied variants. However, for best SI, age at implantation and postimplantation therapy duration should be considered to enable better SI in these children.
Bunton K, Kent RD, Kent JF, Duffy JR. The effects of flattening fundamental frequency contourson sentence intelligibility in speakers with dysarthria. Clin Linguist Phon 2001; 1: 181–193.
Tye-Murray N, Barkmeier J, Folkins JW. Scaling and transcription measures of intelligibility for populations with disordered speech: J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 697–702.
Daneshmandan N, Borghei P. Speech intelligibility development in severe to profound hearing-impaired children and establishment of a data collection for early intervention in hearing-impaired children. Acta Med Iran 2007; 45: 35–42.
Justice L. Communication science and disorders: an introduction. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.; 2006.
Monsen RB. Towards measuring how well hearing-impaired children speak. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 197–219.
Osberger MJ. In: Kent RD, editor. Speech intelligibility in the hearing impaired: research and clinical implications. Intelligibility in speech disorders. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing; 1992; 233–265.
O’Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM. Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet 2000; 356:466–468.
Tobey EA, Geers AE, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 36S–45S.
Osberger MJ, Fisher L. Preoperative predictors of postoperative implant performance in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185: 44–6.
Ertmer DJ. Assessing speech intelligibility in children with hearing loss: toward revitalizing a valuable clinical tool. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2011; 42: 52–8.
Terman L, Merrill M. Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: manual of the third revision, form L-M. Chicago: the Riverside Publishing Company; 1973.
Rifaie N, Mohammed S. The Arabic Language Test-Revised. Benha Med J 2004; 21: 205–216.
Kotby MN, Khairy A, Barakah M, Rifaie N, El-Shobary A. Kotby MN, editor. Language testing of Arabic speaking children. Proceeding of the XVIII world congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. Cairo: secretariat of XXIII World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) 1995; 263–266.
Abdel Hamid A, Bassiouny S, Hegazi M, Saber A, Nassar, G, Ibrahim, A Development of Arabic Speech Intelligibility Test for Children [Thesis]. Unit of Phoniatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University.
Ertmer DJ. Assessing speech intelligibility in children with hearing loss: toward revitalizing a valuable clinical tool. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2011; 42: 52–58.
Wilkins M, Ertmer DJ. Introducing young children who are deaf or hard of hearing to spoken language: child’s voice, an oral school. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2002; 33: 196–204.
Chin SB, Tsai PL, Gao S. Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003; 12: 440–451.
Peng SC, Spencer LJ, Tomblin JB. Speech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with 7 years of device experience. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 47: 1227–1236.
Sharma A, Dorman MF. Central auditory development in children with cochlear implants: clinical implications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 64: 66–88.
Zwolan TA, Collins LM, Wakefield GH. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 3673–3685.
Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DM, Gantz BJ. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 913–920.
Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, Ying E, O’Neill T, Fears B. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 69–73.
Flipsen P. Measuring the intelligibility of conversational speech in children. Clin Linguist Phon 2006; 20: 303–312.
Ertmer DJ. Speech intelligibility in young cochlear implant recipients: gains during year three. Volta Rev 2008; 107: 85–99.
Miyamoto RT, Svirsky M, Kirk K, Robbins AM, Todd S, Riley A. Speech intelligibility of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 35–36.
Lazard DS, Lee HJ, Truy E, Giraud AL. Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34: 1208–1219.
Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venil F, Van de Heyning P, Truy E, Sterkers O, et al. Pre, per and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. PloS One. 2012; 7: e48739. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0048739
Whitehill TL. Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 50–58.
Lach R, Ling D, Ling AH, Ship N. Early speech development in deaf infants. Am Ann Deaf 1970; 115: 522–526.
Warner-Czyz AD, Davis BL, Morrison HM. Production accuracy in a young cochlear implant recipient. Volta Rev 2005; 105: 151–173.
Osberger MJ, McGarr N. In N Lass, editor. Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice. New York: Academic Press; 1982.
Geffner D, Freeman L. In J Subtelny, editor. Speech assessment at the primary level: interpretation relative to speech training. Speech assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired. Washington, DC: A. G. Bell Association;1980; 1–17.
McGarr NS. In J Subtelny, editor. Evaluation of speech in intermediate school-aged deaf children. Special assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association;1980. 45–66.
Conflicts of interest
About this article
Cite this article
Nassar, J.F., Kaddah, FA.A., Abdelhamid, A. et al. Variables affecting speech intelligibility in prelingual Arabic speaking cochlear-implanted children. Egypt J Otolaryngol 31, 54–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.152710
- Arabic test
- cochlear implants
- hearing impairments
- speech intelligibility