Skip to main content

Variables affecting speech intelligibility in prelingual Arabic speaking cochlear-implanted children




Speech intelligibility (SI) is usually expressed as the degree to which a speaker’s intended message can be recovered by other listeners. It is determined by many factors that may be affected by the degree of hearing loss. The use of cochlear implants (CIs) can facilitate the development of speech and language skills of prelingually deaf children. Thus, improvements in SI after CI fitting can provide indirect evidence of sensory aid benefits.


This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the different variables that affect SI in prelingual CI children in order to achieve the maximum benefit for improving SI in such candidates.

Participants and methods

This study included 30 prelingually hearing-impaired participants, with ages ranging from 6 to 10 years. They used bilateral hearing aids for a duration of 2.6 ± 1.7 years before undergoing CI, which was performed at ages ranging from 4 to 9 years. They were enrolled in specific language intervention programs after implantation for a duration ranging from 1 to 3.8 years. Then, the Arabic Speech Intelligibility test was used to assess their SI. The effect of different variables on their SI was assessed through both comparative and correlative analysis.


SI scores showed highly significant differences in patients at younger age at implantation (aged ≤5years) and in those who had received language therapy for more than 2 years after implantation. Meanwhile, preimplantation therapy for more than 1 year and usage of hearing aids for more than 1 year before CI had significant effects on the SI scores. SI was highly significantly negatively correlated with age at CI and highly significantly positively correlated with the duration of postimplantation therapy. The SI scores were also affected by the three groups of the SI test. The front consonants had higher significant scores compared with both back consonants and sentences, and back consonants had significantly higher scores compared with sentences.


The SI of prelingual cochlear-implanted children was affected by all of the studied variants. However, for best SI, age at implantation and postimplantation therapy duration should be considered to enable better SI in these children.


  1. 1

    Bunton K, Kent RD, Kent JF, Duffy JR. The effects of flattening fundamental frequency contourson sentence intelligibility in speakers with dysarthria. Clin Linguist Phon 2001; 1: 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Tye-Murray N, Barkmeier J, Folkins JW. Scaling and transcription measures of intelligibility for populations with disordered speech: J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 697–702.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Daneshmandan N, Borghei P. Speech intelligibility development in severe to profound hearing-impaired children and establishment of a data collection for early intervention in hearing-impaired children. Acta Med Iran 2007; 45: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Justice L. Communication science and disorders: an introduction. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Monsen RB. Towards measuring how well hearing-impaired children speak. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 197–219.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Osberger MJ. In: Kent RD, editor. Speech intelligibility in the hearing impaired: research and clinical implications. Intelligibility in speech disorders. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing; 1992; 233–265.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    O’Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM. Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet 2000; 356:466–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Tobey EA, Geers AE, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 36S–45S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Osberger MJ, Fisher L. Preoperative predictors of postoperative implant performance in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185: 44–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Ertmer DJ. Assessing speech intelligibility in children with hearing loss: toward revitalizing a valuable clinical tool. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2011; 42: 52–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Terman L, Merrill M. Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: manual of the third revision, form L-M. Chicago: the Riverside Publishing Company; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Rifaie N, Mohammed S. The Arabic Language Test-Revised. Benha Med J 2004; 21: 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Kotby MN, Khairy A, Barakah M, Rifaie N, El-Shobary A. Kotby MN, editor. Language testing of Arabic speaking children. Proceeding of the XVIII world congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. Cairo: secretariat of XXIII World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) 1995; 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Abdel Hamid A, Bassiouny S, Hegazi M, Saber A, Nassar, G, Ibrahim, A Development of Arabic Speech Intelligibility Test for Children [Thesis]. Unit of Phoniatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University.

  15. 15

    Ertmer DJ. Assessing speech intelligibility in children with hearing loss: toward revitalizing a valuable clinical tool. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2011; 42: 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Wilkins M, Ertmer DJ. Introducing young children who are deaf or hard of hearing to spoken language: child’s voice, an oral school. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2002; 33: 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Chin SB, Tsai PL, Gao S. Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003; 12: 440–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Peng SC, Spencer LJ, Tomblin JB. Speech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with 7 years of device experience. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 47: 1227–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Sharma A, Dorman MF. Central auditory development in children with cochlear implants: clinical implications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 64: 66–88.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Zwolan TA, Collins LM, Wakefield GH. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 3673–3685.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DM, Gantz BJ. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 913–920.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, Ying E, O’Neill T, Fears B. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Flipsen P. Measuring the intelligibility of conversational speech in children. Clin Linguist Phon 2006; 20: 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Ertmer DJ. Speech intelligibility in young cochlear implant recipients: gains during year three. Volta Rev 2008; 107: 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Miyamoto RT, Svirsky M, Kirk K, Robbins AM, Todd S, Riley A. Speech intelligibility of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lazard DS, Lee HJ, Truy E, Giraud AL. Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34: 1208–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venil F, Van de Heyning P, Truy E, Sterkers O, et al. Pre, per and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. PloS One. 2012; 7: e48739. Available at:

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Whitehill TL. Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Lach R, Ling D, Ling AH, Ship N. Early speech development in deaf infants. Am Ann Deaf 1970; 115: 522–526.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Warner-Czyz AD, Davis BL, Morrison HM. Production accuracy in a young cochlear implant recipient. Volta Rev 2005; 105: 151–173.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Osberger MJ, McGarr N. In N Lass, editor. Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice. New York: Academic Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Geffner D, Freeman L. In J Subtelny, editor. Speech assessment at the primary level: interpretation relative to speech training. Speech assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired. Washington, DC: A. G. Bell Association;1980; 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    McGarr NS. In J Subtelny, editor. Evaluation of speech in intermediate school-aged deaf children. Special assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association;1980. 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Abdelhamid.

Additional information

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nassar, J.F., Kaddah, FA.A., Abdelhamid, A. et al. Variables affecting speech intelligibility in prelingual Arabic speaking cochlear-implanted children. Egypt J Otolaryngol 31, 54–60 (2015).

Download citation


  • Arabic test
  • cochlear implants
  • hearing impairments
  • speech intelligibility