Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Comparison between frequency transposition and frequency compression hearing aids

En

Abstract

Background

High-frequency hearing loss is one of the challenges for accurate hearing. One method of amplification toward improved detection and discrimination of high frequencies is through lowering of high frequencies to a lower-frequency hearing region. Frequency compression (FC) or frequency transposition (FT) can be used for individuals with different configurations of hearing impairment, such as steeply sloping and high-frequency hearing loss (containing high-frequency dead regions).

Objective

The purpose of this review was to compare the effects of FC and FT on the speech recognition abilities of people with hearing impairment.

Patients and methods

This study is a systematic review of previous investigations carried out to test the efficacy of frequency-lowering algorithms (i.e. FC or FT) in improving the detection of high frequencies. The concept of FC and FT depends on enhancement of speech recognition in patients suffering from high-frequency hearing loss. In this review, compression shifting and frequency transposition were compared on the basis of improvements in the audibility of high frequency sound to improve the outstanding and acceptance level of speech.

Conclusion

It can be concluded from this review that both FC and FT are useful in people with high-frequency hearing loss. FC has a potential role in recognition of monosyllabic words, consonants, and sentences in the presence of background noise. In contrast, FT facilitates detection of fricatives that ultimately leads to improvement in the discrimination of consonants. Throughout the literature, only one study has compared both FT and FC using various speech tests to evaluate the performance of different hearing instruments. Therefore, further studies addressing the benefits of both modalities of hearing aids with a more standardized outcome measure for both adult and pediatric patients are required.

References

  1. Davis A. Hearing in adults. London: Whurr; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dillon H. Hearing aids. Sydney, Australia: Boomerang Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moore BC. Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansson, B. A new coding amplifier system for the severely hard of hearing. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Acoustics, Stuttgart; 1961. pp. 655–657.

  5. Velmans M, Marcuson M. The acceptability of spectrum-preserving and spectrum-destroying transposition to severely hearing-impaired listeners. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 17–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McDermott HJ, Dorkos VP, Dean MR, Ching TY. Improvements in speech perception with use of the AVR TranSonic frequency-transposing hearing aid. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 1323–1335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson JD, Baer T, Moore BC. Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuk F. Critical factors in ensuring efficacy of frequency transposition. Part 1: Individualizing the start frequency. Hear Rev 2007; 14:60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuk F, Peeters H, Keenan D, Lau C. Use of frequency transposition in a thin-tube open-ear fitting. Hear J 2007; 60: 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simpson A. Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review. Trends Amplif 2009; 13: 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nearey TM. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 2088–2113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sekimoto S, Saito S. Nonlinear frequency compression speech processing based on the PAR-COR analysis-synthesis technique. Ann Bull Res Inst Logaoedics Phoniatr 1980; 14: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Developing clinical guidelines. Western J Med 1999; 170: 348–351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rees R, Velmans M. The effect of frequency transposition on the untrained auditory discrimination of congenitally deaf children. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 53–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Auriemmo J, Kuk F, Lau C, Marshall S, Thiele N, Pikora M, et al. Effect of linear frequency transposition on speech recognition and production of school-age children. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20: 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuk F, Keenan D, Korhonen P, Lau CC. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20: 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson JD, Stainsby TH, Baer T, Moore BC. Evaluation of a frequency transposition algorithm using wearable hearing aids. Int J Audiol 2009; 48: 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakamoto S, Goto K, Tateno M, Kaga K. Frequency compression hearing aid for severe-to-profound hearing impairments. Auris Nasus Larynx 2000; 27: 327–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson A, Hersbach AA, McDermott HJ. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson A, Hersbach AA, McDermott HJ. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ, McKarns SA. Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50: 1194–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glista D, Scollie S, Bagatto M, Seewald R, Parsa V, Johnson A. Evaluation f nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol 2009; 48: 632–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bohnert A, Nyffeler M, Keilmann A. Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267: 1045–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E, Nyffeler M, Boretzki M, Caraway T, Hudson M. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2011; 50: 396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khalid A, et al. Antimicrobial activity analysis of extracts of Acacia modesta. Afr J Biotechnol 2003; 10: 4574–4580.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prates LPCS, Silva FJF, Iório MCM. Frequency compression and its effects in speech recognition. Pro Fono 2009; 21: 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Braida LD, Durlach NI, Lippmann RP, Hicks BL, Rabinowitz WM, Reed CM. Hearing aids: a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. Rockville, MD: ASLHA; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stevens LM, Lynm C, Glass RM. Medical journals. JAMA 2006; 295: 1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, Stürzebecher E, Baumgartner W, Schmidt M, et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stelmachowicz PG, Pittman AL, Hoover BM, Lewis DE. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 2183–2190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Posen MP, Reed CM, Braida LD. Intelligibility of frequency-lowered speech produced by a channel vocoder. J Rehabil Res Dev 1993; 30: 26–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beasley DS, Mosher NL, Orchik DJ. Use of frequency-shifted/time-compressed speech with hearing-impaired children. Audiology 1976; 15: 395–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McDermott HJ, Dean MR. Speech perception with steeply sloping hearing loss: effects of frequency transposition. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 353–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Velmans M. Effects of frequency ‘recoding’ on the articulation learning of perceptively deaf children. Lang Speech 1975; 18: 180–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Blamey PJ, Clark GM, Tong YC, Ling D. Perceptual-oral training of two hearing-impaired children in the recognition and production of /s/ and /z/. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 375–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 538–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeinab A. AlQudehy MBBS.

Additional information

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alnahwi, M., AlQudehy, Z.A. Comparison between frequency transposition and frequency compression hearing aids. Egypt J Otolaryngol 31, 10–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.152703

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.152703

Keywords