- Original Article
- Open access
- Published:
A comparative study of audiological and surgical results in partial versus complete strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology volume 30, pages 1–4 (2014)
En
Abstract
Hypothesis
Different techniques used in cartilage tympanoplasty are palisade technique, shield graft, in-lay butterfly graft, and island flap cartilage.
Purpose
The aim of the study was to compare audiological and graft take results in partial versus complete strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty.
Materials and methods
A total of 60 patients with central perforation of the tympanic membrane and age ranging from 18 to 40 years were selected. They were divided into two equal study groups of 30 patients each. The first group underwent complete strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty and the second group underwent partial strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty.
Results
The overall success rate was 83.3% in the complete strip technique and 86.66% in the partial strip technique. In both study groups, there was statistically significant difference between the audiological results before and after operation. Furthermore, audiological and graft take results were better in the partial strip technique but with no statistically significant difference.
Conclusion
The overall results of partial strip tympanoplasty are better than complete strip tympanoplasty regarding graft take and audiological results.
References
Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series. Laryngoscope 2003; 113(11):1844–56.
Amedee RG, Mann WJ, Riechelmann H. Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 1989; 10(6):447–50.
Duckert LG, Muller J, Makielski KH, Helms J. Composite autograft “shield” reconstruction of remnant tympanic membranes. Am J Otol 1995; 16(1):21–6.
Page C, Charlet L, Strunski V. Cartilage tympanoplasty: postoperative functional results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 265(10):1195–8.
Tos M. Cartilage Tympanoplasty. 1st ed. (2009). New York: Thieme; 2009: 7, 147.
Soliman S. Speech discrimination audiometry using Arabic phonetically balanced words. Ain-Shams med. J, 1976; 27: 27:30.
Hashemi SB, Sohrabi H, Omranifard H. Comparison of tympanoplasty results with use of perichondrium-cartilage and temporalis facia. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 21(56):63–66.
Mokhtarinejad F, Abtahi SH, Noei Alamdary Sh. Postoperative anatomic and functional results of homograft cartilage tympanoplasty. J Res Med Sci 2012; 17(Spec 1):S120–S124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
AbdelKader, H.A., Khafagy, A.G. & Rahman, T.T.A. A comparative study of audiological and surgical results in partial versus complete strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty. Egypt J Otolaryngol 30, 1–4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.127183
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.127183