Sensory processing profile among a sample of Egyptian children with different types of delayed language development: correlations of different variables

The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology

Table 6 Comparison between the SP of children with ASD and that of children with ID

Language disorders Sensory profile	ASD	ID
Language disorders Sensory profile	M (SD)	M (SD)	p value
S1	2.36 (± 0.92)	1.44 (± 0.53)	0.016
S2	1.72 (± 0.9)	1.44 (± 0.66)	0.419
S3	2.09 (± 1.04)	2.11	0.966
S4	1.63 (± 0.92)	2 (± 1)	0.41
S5	2.0 (± 0.63)	1.88 (± 0.92)	0.754
S6	1.90 (± 1.04)	2 (± 0.86)	0.837
M1	2.36 (± 0.92)	2.55 (± 0.88)	0.643
M2	2.00 (± 0.77)	1.88 (± 0.92)	0.774
M3	2.45 (± 0.82)	1.88 (± 1.05)	0.193
M4	2.63 (± 0.50)	2.55 (± 0.55)	0.731
M5	1.63 (± 0.67)	2.11 (± 0.78)	0.162
E1	2.72 (± 0.46)	1.88 (± 0.92)	0.017
E2	2.72 (± 0.46)	1.7 (± 1)	0.006
E3	2.0 (± 0.77)	1.3 (± 0.5)	0.039

Independent t-test
S1 auditory processing, S2 visual processing, S3 vestibular processing, S4 touch processing, S5 multisensory processing, S6 oral processing, M1 tone/endurance, M2 body position and movement, M3 modulation of movement affecting activity level, M4 modulation of sensory input affecting emotional response, M5 modulation of visual input affecting emotional response and activity, E1 emotional/social, E2 behavioral outcomes of sensory processing, E3 thresholds for response, SP sensory processing lang., dis language disorders, M mean, SD standard deviation
The table showed the significance of difference between the mean of responses among children with ASD and children suffering from other types of DLD