Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of the SP between children with SLI and that of ADHD, ASD, and ID

From: Sensory processing profile among a sample of Egyptian children with different types of delayed language development: correlations of different variables

Language disorders

SP

SLI

ADHD

ASD

ID

M (SD)

M (SD)

p value

M (SD)

p value

M (SD)

p value

S1

2.17 (± 0.88)

2.0 (± 0.89)

0.499

2.4 (± 0.9)

0.569

1.44 (± 0.53)

0.029

S2

1.43 (± 0.78)

1.73 (± 0.87)

0.222

1.7 (± 0.9)

0.341

1.44 (± 0.66)

0.973

S3

1.91 (± 0.99)

2.15 (± 0.96)

0.395

2.09 (± 1)

0.635

2.11 (± 1.05)

0.622

S4

1.91 (± 0.94)

2.03 (± 0.77)

0.613

1.63 (± 0.9)

0.429

2 (± 1)

0.820

S5

2.04 (± 0.87)

2.23 (± 0.86)

0.456

2.0 (± 0.63)

0.884

1.88 (± 0.92)

0.662

S6

2.08 (± 0.90)

1.92 (± 0.93)

0.536

1.9 (± 1.04)

0.612

2(± 0.86)

0.806

M1

1.73 (± 0.96)

2.23 (± 0.9)

0.072

2.36(± 0.9)

0.083

2.55 (± 0.88)

0.035

M2

2.43 (± 0.84)

2.34 (± 0.89)

0.723

2.0 (± 0.78)

0.159

1.88(± 0.92)

0.120

M3

1.78 (± 0.79)

1.65 (± 0.74)

0.561

2.5 (± 0.82)

0.029*

1.88 (± 1.05)

0.759

M4

2.69 (± 0.70)

2.5 (± 0.81)

0.375

2.63 (± 0.5)

0.804

2.55 (± 0.55)

0.594

M5

1.82 (± 0.83)

1.88 (± 0.71)

0.792

1.63 (± 0.7)

0.516

2.11 (± 0.78)

0.384

E1

2.08 (± 0.84)

2.23 (± 0.9)

0.571

2.7 (± 0.46)

0.026*

1.88 (± 0.92)

0.567

E2

2.52 (± 0.73)

2.30 (± 0.83)

0.348

2.7 (± 0.46)

0.402

1.7 (± 1)

0.012

E3

2.17 (± 0.88)

1.96 (± 0.87)

0.403

2.0 (± 0.77)

0.582

1.3 (± 0.5)

0.012

  1. Independent t-test
  2. S1 auditory processing, S2 visual processing, S3 vestibular processing, S4 touch processing S5 multisensory processing, S6 oral processing, M1 tone/endurance, M2 body position and movement, M3 modulation of movement affecting activity level, M4 modulation of sensory input affecting emotional response, M5 modulation of visual input affecting emotional response and activity, E1 emotional/social, E2 behavioral outcomes of sensory processing, E3 thresholds for response. SP sensory processing lang., dis language disorders, M mean, SD standard deviation
  3. The table showed the significance of the difference between the mean of responses among children with SLI and children suffering from other types of DLD
  4. *mean significant difference