Skip to main content

Table 10 Inter-rater agreement between first and second observer in SnF group and SA group pre- and post-therapy

From: A comparative study of stretch-and-flow voice therapy versus Smith accent method in rehabilitation of hyperfunctional dysphonia: a randomized controlled trial

 

Group A (SnF group)

Group B (SA group)

Kappa

95% CI

Kappa

95% CI

Pre-therapy

 A. Grade of dysphonia

1.000

1.000 to 1.000

1.000

1.000 to 1.000

 B. Voice quality

1.000

1.000 to 1.000

1.000

1.000 to 1.000

 C. Voice pitch

0.952

0.859 to 1.000

1.000

1.000 to 1.000

 D. Voice loudness

0.634

0.178 to 1.000

0.870

0.620 to 1.000

Post-therapy

 A. Grade of dysphonia

0.800

0.625 to 0.975

0.647

0.378 to 0.916

 B. Voice quality

0.896

0.688 to 1.000

0.793

0.522 to 1.000

 C. Voice pitch

0.844

0.553 to 1.000

0.839

0.532 to 1.000

 D. Voice loudness

1.000

1.000 to 1.000

1.000

1.000 to 1.000

  1. CI confident interval (kappa ≤ 0 indicated no agreement, 0.01–0.20 indicated none to a slight agreement, 0.21–0.40 fair agreement, 0.41–0.60 moderate agreement, 0 l.61–0.80 substantial agreement, and 0.81–1.00 almost perfect agreement)