Table 3 Pooling of estimated success rates using random effect model
Study | Sample size | Event | ES | 95% CI | Weight% (random) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ziegler et al., 2004 [12] | 17 | 17 | 1.000 | 81.6 to 100 | 5.1 |
Marchal F., 2007 [10] | 29 | 20 | 0.690 | 50.8 to 82.7 | 6.59 |
Nahlieli et al., 2007 [13] | 172 | 165 | 0.959 | 91.8 to 98 | 10.17 |
Liu et al., 2009 [14] | 28 | 27 | 0.964 | 82.3 to 99.4 | 6.49 |
Walvekar et al., 2009 [5] | 16 | 14 | 0.875 | 64 to 96.5 | 4.93 |
Su et al., 2010 [15] | 18 | 17 | 0.944 | 74.2 to 99 | 5.26 |
Wallace et al., 2010 [16] | 5 | 5 | 1.000 | 56.6 to 100 | 2.31 |
Kopec et al., 2013 [17] | 21 | 21 | 1.000 | 84.5 to 100 | 5.69 |
Gallipoli et al., 2013 [18] | 18 | 16 | 0.889 | 67.2 to 96.9 | 5.26 |
Liu et al., 2013 [19] | 70 | 66 | 0.943 | 86.2 to 97.8 | 8.75 |
N. Schwartz et al., 2015 [11] | 39 | 33 | 0.846 | 70.3 to 92.8 | 7.38 |
Aleksandar and Jure, 2016 [20] | 33 | 33 | 1.000 | 89.6 to 100 | 6.94 |
Xia et al., 2016 [21] | 8 | 8 | 1.000 | 67.6 to 100 | 3.21 |
Capaccio et al., 2017 [22] | 479 | 472 | 0.985 | 97 to 99.3 | 10.95 |
Zhao et al., 2020 [8] | 514 | 466 | 0.907 | 87.8 to 92.9 | 10.99 |
Total (random effects) | 1467 | 1380 | 0.955 | 91.4 to 98.5% | 100 |