Table 1 Literature review, demography, tumor size, and surgical approaches of all reported de novo PPS pleomorphic adenoma (in chronological order)
S. No | Author | Year | Age | Sex | Tumor size (cm) | Surgical approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bent et al. [9] | 1992 | 35 | Female | 4.4 × 2.8 | Transoral |
2 | Varghese et al. [10] | 2003 | 40 | Male | 6.0 × 4.0 × 2.5 | Mandibular swing |
3 | Brigger et al. [8] | 2005 | 16 | Male | 4.5 × 3.5 × 3.0 | Transoral |
4 | Hakeem et al. [1] | 2009 | 20 | Male | 8.0 × 6.0 | Transcervical |
5 | Hakeem et al.[1] | 2009 | 53 | Male | 6.0 × 5.0 | Transcervical |
6 | Rawat et al. [11] | 2012 | 42 | Female | 8.0 × 7.0 × 5.0 | Mandibular swing |
7 | Bhadani et al. [7] | 2013 | 15 | Female | 7.5 × 5.5 × 4.5 | NA |
8 | Jain et al. [12] | 2013 | 35 | Female | 4.8 × 3.1 × 5.0 | Transoral |
9 | Hwang et al. [13] | 2013 | 34 | Male | 8.4 × 6.5 × 3.9 | Transoral – transcervical |
10 | Akin et al. [14] | 2014 | 50 | Male | 9.0 × 6.0 × 2.5 | Transcervical |
11 | Akin et al. [14] | 2014 | 56 | Male | 3.0 × 4.0 | Transcervical |
12 | Phookan et al. [6] | 2015 | 45 | Female | 8.0 × 6.0 × 5.0 | Mandibular swing |
13 | Ray et al. [15] | 2016 | 54 | Female | 6.0 × 6.0 | Transcervical |
14 | Laturiya et al. [16] | 2016 | 27 | Female | 6.5 × 5.5 × 4.2 | Transcervical-transoral |
15 | Bist et al. [17] | 2016 | 60 | Male | 10 × 8.2 × 5.8 | Transcervical |
16 | Malhotra et al. [18] | 2017 | 25 | Male | 13 × 15 × 8.0 | Transcervical |
17 | Sagar et al. [19] | 2018 | 25 | Male | 15 × 11 × 7.5 | Transcervical-transparotid |
18 | Ahmed A et al. [20] | 2019 | 44 | Female | 5.1 × 3.4 × 4.4 | Transcervical |
19 | Galleti et al. [21] | 2019 | 63 | Male | 8.0 × 6.0 | Transcervical |
20 | Present study | 2022 | 12 | Female | 6.0 × 5.5 × 4.5 | Transcervical-transparotid |