Skip to main content

Table 6 Percentages and comparison among the participants in different specialties regarding the used swallowing tests or dysphagia investigations in their institute

From: The awareness and knowledge of dysphagia among health care practitioners in Egypt

 

All (N%)

Internal medicine (N=26)

Specialties with lower contact with dysphagia cases (N=99)

Pediatrics (N=8)

Neurology (N=23)

Physiotherapy (N=32)

P value

Water test

44 (23.4%)

3 (11.5%)

15 (15.2%)

1 (12.5%)

18 (78.3%)

7 (21.9%)

*<0.0001

Blue-dye test

14 (7.4%)

2 (7.7%)

7 (7.1%)

1 (12.5%)

2 (8.7%)

2 (6.25%)

0.89

FEES

50 (26.6%)

8 (30.8%)

11 (11.1%)

3 (37.5%)

16 (69.6%)

12 (37.5%)

*<0.0001

VFSS/Modified Barium study

36 (19.1%)

6 (23.1%)

14 (14.1%)

0 (0%)

6 (26.1%)

10 (31.3%)

0.1

Manometry

30 (16%)

7 (26.9%)

18 (18.2%)

3 (37.5%)

1 (4.3%)

1 (3.1%)

*0.012

Cine MRI

11 (5.9%)

3 (11.5%)

5 (5.1%)

0 (0%)

1 (4.3%)

2 (6.25%)

0.74

SWAL-QOL

5 (2.7%)

0 (0%)

4 (4%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (3.1%)

0.93

EAT-10

5 (2.7%)

0 (0%)

3 (3%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (6.25%)

0.6

Dysphagia handicap index

8 (4.3%)

2 (7.7%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (4.3%)

5 (15.6%)

*0.002

Don’t know

87 (46.3%)

10 (38.5%)

55 (55.6%)

4 (50%)

2 (8.7%)

16 (50%)

*0.001

  1. SWAL-QOL Swallowing Quality of Life, FEES fiber-optic evaluation of swallowing), VFSS video-fluoroscopic swallowing study
  2. *Significant P value <0.05