Table 9 Comparison between study groups I and II regarding the number and percent of abnormality in central auditory processing tests
From: Deficits in central auditory processing among migraine patients
Group I | Group II | X2* | P value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | ||||
Rt SPIN | Abnormal | 20 | 100.0% | 20 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.00 |
Lt SPIN | Abnormal | 18 | 90.0% | 20 | 100.0% | 2.11 | 0.49 |
Rt DD | Abnormal | 18 | 90.0% | 17 | 85.0% | 0.23 | 1.00 |
Lt DD | Abnormal | 19 | 95.0% | 17 | 85.0% | 1.11 | 0.61 |
Rt DP | Abnormal | 17 | 85.0% | 19 | 95.0% | 1.11 | 0.61 |
Lt DP | Abnormal | 17 | 85.0% | 19 | 95% | 1.11 | 0.61 |
GIN | Abnormal | 20 | 100% | 20 | 100% | 0 | 1.00 |
Recognition memory | Abnormal | 15 | 75% | 15 | 75% | 0 | 1.00 |
Memory for content | Abnormal | 9 | 45% | 9 | 45% | 0 | 1.00 |
Memory for sequence | Abnormal | 9 | 45% | 9 | 45% | 0 | 1.00 |