Table 2 Comparison between Draff III and Draff IIB regarding the success rate
| Â | Failed | Succeeded | X2 | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of operation (mode of technique) | Draff IIB | No. | 2 | 2 | 2.715 | .099 |
% | 50% | 50% | ||||
Draff III | No. | 1 | 9 | |||
% | 10% | 90% | ||||
| Â | Failed | Succeeded | X2 | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of operation (mode of technique) | Draff IIB | No. | 2 | 2 | 2.715 | .099 |
% | 50% | 50% | ||||
Draff III | No. | 1 | 9 | |||
% | 10% | 90% | ||||