Skip to main content

Table 5 The incidence of complications in between the two studied groups. No significant difference was found between the groups. However, the complications in the conventional group were graver than those in the endoscopic group. On the one hand, a case of TM perforation and another of facial nerve paresis occurred in the posterior tympanotomy group. On the other hand, a case of PCW perforation, another case of chorda tympani injury, and a third case of TMF perforation occurred in the endoscopic group

From: Endoscopic-assisted epitympanic approach: a feasible technique for cochlear implantation

Complications

Groups

Total (%) within group

Conventional (n = 20)

Endoscopic (n = 20)

No

 ▪ n

18

17

 

 ▪ % within Complications

51.43%

48.57%

35

 ▪ % within group

90.00%

85.00%

87.50%

Yes

 ▪ n

2

3

5

 ▪ % within Complications

40.00%

60.00%

12.50%

 ▪ % within group

10.00%

15.00%

 

Total (% within group)

 ▪ n

20

20

40

 ▪ % within Complications

50.00%

50.00%

100.00%

Test of Significance

X2(df = 1) = 0.229

p = 0.633 NS

  1. n number of patients, χ2 Pearson chi-square, df degree of freedom, NS statistically not significant
  2. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05)