Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the two studied groups and the effect of treatment on OSAS group according to cVEMP

From: Postoperative audiovestibular assessment of obstructive sleep apnea patients

cVEMP

Cases (n = 30)

Control (n = 20)

Pre-treatment

Post-treatment

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

P1N1 response detection in percentage

      

 Absent

6

20.0

6

20.0

0

0.0

 Present

24

80.0

24

80.0

20

100.0

 Sig. bet. grps.

McNp1 = 1.000, χ2p2 = 0.069, χ2p30.069

P1 latency

(n = 24)

(n = 24)

(n = 20)

 Min.-max.

8.64-23.60

8.27-24.80

11.16-15.10

 Mean ± SD.

16.26 ± 4.37

14.94 ± 4.22

14.45 ± 0.99

 Median

18.12

13.62

14.91

 Sig. bet. grps.

tpp1 = 0.130, tp2 = 0.060, tp3 = 0.174

N1 latency

(n = 24)

(n = 24)

(n = 20)

 Min.-max.

10.24-24.50

9.52-27.07

17.31-21.20

 Mean ± SD.

21.19 ± 3.67

20.51 ± 4.07

19.63 ± 1.21

 Median

22.40

19.96

19.60

 Sig. bet. grps.

tpp1 = 0.558, tp2 = 0.066, tp3 = 0.334

P1-N1 amplitude

(n = 24)

(n = 24)

(n = 20)

 Min.-max.

7.68-24.62

8.76-24.91

9.45-31.17

 Mean ± SD.

15.75 ± 4.74

15.89 ± 4.05

21.37 ± 5.36

 Median

16.84

16.23

21.40

 Sig. bet. grps.

tpp1 = 0.867, tp2 = 0.001*, tp3 < 0.001*

  1. Sig. bet. grps significance between groups, tp paired t test, t Student’s t test, McN McNemar test, χ2 chi-square test, p1 p value for comparing between cases pre- and post-treatment, p2 p value for comparing between cases at pre-treatment and control. p3 p value for comparing between cases at post-treatment and control
  2. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05