Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison between repaired and unrepaired velopharyngeal insufficiency regarding post-intervention nasometer values

From: Efficacy of an Arabic articulatory errors remediation software program in patients with velopharyngeal valve dysfunction: a quasi-experimental study

 

Repaired VPI

(n = 18)

Unrepaired VPI

(n = 7)

Test of significance (p)

/a/

 Median (min–max)

20 (5–99)

11 (5–37)

(U = 51, p = .495)

/i/

 

 Median (min–max)

42.5 (13–98)

53 (12–72)

(U = 56, p = .7)

/u/

 Median (min–max)

30.5(2–90)

17 (3–57)

(U = 52, p = .534)

/b/

 Median (min–max)

16 (5–92)

15 (4–75)

(U = 54, p= .615)

/t/

 

 Median (min–max)

17(3–92)

23 (11–87)

(U = 50, p = .82)

/k/

 

 Median (min–max)

20 (4–98)

26 (7–73)

(U = 54.5, p = .757)

Nasal sentences

 

 Median (min–max)

60.5(37–97)

57 (52–69)

(U = 43, p = .914)

Oral sentences

 

 Median (min–max)

29 ( 14–88)

32.5 (19–55)

(U = 50, p = .82)

  1. U Mann-Whitney test, p p value, significance < 0.05