Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison between mean of nasometer values before and after the intervention

From: Efficacy of an Arabic articulatory errors remediation software program in patients with velopharyngeal valve dysfunction: a quasi-experimental study

Nasometer values

Pre

Post

Test of sig.

p

/a/

(n = 40)

(n = 40)

  

 Min.–max.

7.0–93.0

3.0–99.0

Z = 3.999*

< 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

42.03 ± 20.0

24.65 ± 21.03

 Median

44.50

22.0

/i/

(n = 40)

(n = 40)

  

 Min.–max.

5.0–96.0

7.0–98.0

t = 5.438*

< 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

66.0 ± 25.78

46.40 ± 21.96

 Median

76.0

45.0

/u/

(n = 40)

(n = 40)

  

 Min.–max.

6.0–87.0

2.0–98.0

Z = 3.636*

< 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

45.23 ± 25.19

30.35 ± 23.24

 Median

44.50

28.50

/b/

(n = 40)

(n = 40)

  

 Min.–max.

7.0–95.0

0.0–98.0

Z = 3.979*

< 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

60.90 ± 30.27

29.95 ± 30.36

 Median

75.50

16.50

/t/

(n = 38)

(n = 39)

  

 Min.–max.

10.0–91.0

0.0–92.0

Z = 4.112*

< 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

50.18 ± 28.94

27.05 ± 27.13

 Median

43.50

16.0

/k/

(n = 32)

(n = 40)

  

 Min.–max.

7.0–94.0

0.0–98.0

Z = 2.674*

0.007*

 Mean ± SD

46.50 ± 27.15

30.63 ± 25.17

 Median

41.0

20.0

Nasal sentence

(n = 40)

(n = 40)

  

 Min.–max.

42.0–92.0

37.0–97.0

t = 3.864*

< 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

71.83 ± 13.01

60.98 ± 12.15

 Median

71.0

60.50

Oral sentence

(n = 40)

(n = 40)

  

 Min.–max

8.0–87.0

9.0–99.0

Z = 3.623*

< 0.001*

 Mean ± SD

48.78 ± 19.11

35.25 ± 18.80

 Median

52.0

34.0

  1. t paired t test, Z Wilcoxon signed ranks test
  2. p p value for comparing between pre and post
  3. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
  4. **HHighly significant < .001