Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison between male and female teachers in Auditory Perceptual Assessment

From: Comparison between male and female teachers in Egyptian primary schools regarding the effect of teaching on their voice

 

Male (GI)

(n = 100)

Female (GII)

(n = 100)

P value

Grade of dysphonia

  

0.031*

 0

62(62%)

41(41%)

 

 I

30(30%)

42(42%)

 I–II

1(1%)

4(4%)

 II

6(6%)

11(11%)

 II–III

0(0%)

1(1%)

 III

1(1%)

1(1%)

Leaky

  

0.185

 0

76(76%)

61(61%)

 

 I

17(17%)

24(24%)

 I–II

1(1%)

2(2%)

 II

5(5%)

11(11%)

 II–III

0(0%)

1(1%)

 III

1(1%)

1(1%)

Strained

  

0.145

 0

79(79%)

68(68%)

 

 I

18(18%)

21(21%)

 I–II

0(0%)

2(2%)

 II

3(3%)

8(8%)

 II–III

0(0%)

0(0%)

 III

0(0%)

1(1%)

Irregular

84(84%)

 

0.203

 0

15(15%)

73(73%)

 

 I

1(1%)

24(24%)

 I–II

0(0%)

3(3%)

 II

0(0%)

0(0%)

 II–III

 

0(0%)

 III

  

Pitch

  

0.016*

 Normal

61(61%)

44(44%)

 

 Decrease

39(39%)

56(56%)

Register

  

0.683

 Modal

98(98%)

96(96%)

 

 Break

2(2%)

3(3%)

 Fry

0(0%)

1(1%)

 Falsetto

0(0%)

0(0%)

Loudness

  

 Affected

0(0%)

0(0%)

 

 Normal

100(100%)

100(100%)

Glottal attack

  

 Not hard

100(100%)

100(100%)

 

 Hard

0(0%)

0(0%)

Laryngeal function

  

0.086

 Not affected

64(64%)

52(52%)

 

 Affected

36(36%)

48(48%)

  1. Non-significant (P ≥ 0.05), significant (P < 0.05), highly significant (P < 0.001)