Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of on axis velocity scores of rhythmic weight shift between studied groups

From: Effect of body weight on static and dynamic posturography

 NWUWOWOBP valueS
SML33.022.92.80.49NS
SD(0.5)(0.5)(0.5)(0.5)  
MML4.84.54.74.50.62NS
SD(0.9)(0.8)(0.8)(0.8)  
FML8.97.28.047.70.01*S*
SD(2.1)(1.8)(1.9)(2.1)  
CML5.64.95.24.70.04*S**
SD(1.01)(0.8)(0.9)(0.9)  
SAP2.11.92.32.20.77NS
SD(0.4)(0.5)(1.03)1.4)  
MAP3.22.93.12.80.65NS
SD(0.7)(0.5)(1.02)(1.1)  
FAP5.24.85.0440.08NS
SD(1.5)(0.7)(1.6)(1.3)  
CAP3.53.33.53.010.42NS
SD(0.8)(0.5)(1.1)(0.9)  
  1. The mean difference is statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 level
  2. SML, slow mediolateral; MML, moderate mediolateral; FML, fast mediolateral; CML, composite mediolateral; SAP, slow anteroposterior; MAP, moderate anteroposterior; FAP, fast antero-posterior; CAP, composite anteroposterior; NS, no statistically significant difference; S*, significant difference between NW and OB and between UW and OB; S**, significant difference between NW and OB and between UW and OB