Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of on axis velocity scores of rhythmic weight shift between studied groups

From: Effect of body weight on static and dynamic posturography

 

NW

UW

OW

OB

P value

S

SML

3

3.02

2.9

2.8

0.49

NS

SD

(0.5)

(0.5)

(0.5)

(0.5)

  

MML

4.8

4.5

4.7

4.5

0.62

NS

SD

(0.9)

(0.8)

(0.8)

(0.8)

  

FML

8.9

7.2

8.04

7.7

0.01*

S*

SD

(2.1)

(1.8)

(1.9)

(2.1)

  

CML

5.6

4.9

5.2

4.7

0.04*

S**

SD

(1.01)

(0.8)

(0.9)

(0.9)

  

SAP

2.1

1.9

2.3

2.2

0.77

NS

SD

(0.4)

(0.5)

(1.03)

1.4)

  

MAP

3.2

2.9

3.1

2.8

0.65

NS

SD

(0.7)

(0.5)

(1.02)

(1.1)

  

FAP

5.2

4.8

5.04

4

0.08

NS

SD

(1.5)

(0.7)

(1.6)

(1.3)

  

CAP

3.5

3.3

3.5

3.01

0.42

NS

SD

(0.8)

(0.5)

(1.1)

(0.9)

  
  1. The mean difference is statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 level
  2. SML, slow mediolateral; MML, moderate mediolateral; FML, fast mediolateral; CML, composite mediolateral; SAP, slow anteroposterior; MAP, moderate anteroposterior; FAP, fast antero-posterior; CAP, composite anteroposterior; NS, no statistically significant difference; S*, significant difference between NW and OB and between UW and OB; S**, significant difference between NW and OB and between UW and OB